ext_6782 ([identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] mrissa 2014-05-03 10:35 am (UTC)

And my comment "alphabets they were not originally in" is a bit facetious since very few if any non-constructed languages were originally in an alphabet. Nonetheless, it does seem to be non-trivial to stick languages into alphabets that were conceived of for unrelated languages, leading to all kinds of choices that are approximations at best.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting