Twice five

Mar. 30th, 2005 08:13 pm
mrissa: (question)
[personal profile] mrissa
Just a note before I get to [livejournal.com profile] songwind's questions: I called my state rep, and I'd advise you other Minnesotans to do the same. The magic information on how to contact your own rep is here. They're voting on HF6, which is an amendment to the state constitution banning gay marriage. Didn't we already go through this and they lost? Yes. Yes, we did. But apparently we're going through it again. If you feel strongly about this, call and tell them that intrusive discrimination is not the Minnesotan way. I have no faith whatsoever that my rep will listen (I voted for the other lady), but I want to do my part to give them a twinge of conscience when they try to claim this is what their constituents really want. Also, even the wrong rep can make the right choice sometimes. It can't hurt. It took me less than five minutes.

Anyway, [livejournal.com profile] songwind wants to know :

1. You said yesterday that you like EVERYTHING about Minnesota. Since I'm a transplant, what would you take me to do/see that I probably haven't?

Have you been to Minnehaha Falls? I was there Monday. It is cool rain or shine. Have you been to Lock and Dam Number One? The Como Park Conservatory? Have you walked around Lake of the Isles? All of those things are nifty and free, and we will gladly take you and whatever component of your family you can dragoon into it.

2. Did you like college life? Why or why not?

I loved college life for the first three or three and a half years. Adored it. It was so much better than high school, I could hardly express the wonder of it. My department was everything I had always wanted out of school and never gotten (and, incidentally, didn't really get out of most of the rest of my Gustavus classes, either; everything I say about college is about being a physics major, because it was the instant and total filter on my eyes, rose-colored or otherwise). I've said a couple of times that the six professors and assorted students of the Gustavus Physics Department are the largest institution I have ever trusted, and I think it's still true, and likely to remain so.

I also felt very strongly about my dorm. Wahlstrom (Wahlly, Wahlly World) was ancient and decrepit, and the heaters worked too hard or not at all, and they made banging noises, and there were no hallways so you were always wandering through someone's living room, and the rooms were 6'x10' and painted hideous pastel colors. And I loved it. It was a great place to be a gregarious introvert, because I could always wander around and find somebody hanging around in their section lounge playing cards or talking or whatever, or I could leave my door open and converse with passersby -- but when I was done with the gregarious part, I could close my door and be as introverted as I needed to be in my little bitty single room. We had a lovely assortment of geeks, artists, stoners, and combinations of the previous three. I never miss being a college student, but occasionally I wish I could just stick everybody I like in Wahlly for a week or a month.

However. By the time I was a senior, things had changed around the college (in part due to the tornado -- the paternalistic streak in a lot of administrators came out in response to the disaster in ways that were not all right), and I had grown up enough that the situation that looked so free and amazing a few weeks after my 17th birthday looked annoyingly restrictive by my 20th. It took me about a year of grad school to be conscious of it, but by the middle of my senior year, I was really really done letting other people dictate what was important for me to learn. [livejournal.com profile] dd_b has said that he was not an English major because it might have interfered with his reading, and I have had similar feelings about the English major. I began to have them about institutional learning in general. And most of what it was getting in the way of was my writing.

For various personal reasons, my last semester of college was wretched. I'm glad of the results of it. Several important things happened then. But they were not any fun at the time, and just in terms of what I learned through the formal college setting, it was a total waste of my time, and I should have left after Nuke in January, which would have been a high note. Everything after that was marking time, in terms of learning, and I hate marking time.

This is probably a good thing. It would be pretty pathetic if I was still yearning for my halcyon college days.

3. What's your favorite non-SF novel?

I assume you're including fantasy in with the SF label? If not, please do let me know.

Anyway: this is no easier than determining a favorite novel without restrictions, because I read a fair amount outside the genre. Nicola Griffith's The Blue Place is brilliant, and I love it. It's a very different book from any of the Anthony Price books. Which are very different from Dumas. Which is very different from Pat Barker's WWI trilogy. Which is very different from The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay. Which is very different from the Lymond Chronicles. Oh, and there's Smilla's Sense of Snow, I love that book, and Sula and Sharon Kay Penman and Richard Powers and a bunch of the Kate Wilhelms, though not all, and An Instance of the Fingerpost....

I like books, is what.

4. I know you like dogs. What other sorts of pets do you like?

To own? None. One dog, period.

To enjoy at other people's house? Well, I like cats, and cats seem to like me all right, mostly. Some ferrets are nice, and others are not. Hedgehogs are lovely. I'm not much for the family rodentia in general. Anything without fur is not my idea of a good pet, but some people's fish are gorgeous.

5. Is it normal for families of Scandinavian descent to have close ties between the family still in the "old country" and the American side, or have I been exposed to a skewed population sample?

Normal? Yes. Typical? No. That is to say, I don't think it's a shock to anybody that I know some of my relatives in the old countries, but if you select a random Scandosotan, you can't expect them to refer to their uncle in Stockholm or their cousins in Trondheim quite so readily.



And while I'm at it, [livejournal.com profile] cadithial asked :

1. Want another person on your alpha reader list? :)

Heh. Thanks. The alpha reader list is extremely short. The alpha reader list contains two people (and a potential third if she has time) outside the house, two inside. The alpha readers have all read previous books of mine and critiqued them, so I know how they think, how they work, and how they react to problems in my work. They will be slogging through the very, very hard part. They will probably have to say, "Honey, I love you, and this is how your book sucks" more times than any human being ever should have to. They may despair. if I'm any indication, they almost certainly will.

The potential beta reader list, however, is opt-in, and if you want me to put you on that filter to ask when the time comes, I can do that. It will still be a crit list -- of course -- but the mistakes will, I hope, be at a higher level by then.

2. Which state other than MN did you like best?

For what? There are many pleasant things to visit in California. Colorado has its points. Oregon, oh, Oregon was a very good place to spend a summer. (Ohio, sadly, was not. I probably had a better time in Ohio than in Oregon, but it wasn't Ohio's fault, it was the people I was with. Hi, [livejournal.com profile] steve_dash_o!) If I had to live in a state other than Minnesota...well, I'd live in Hudson, WI, or somewhere like that, is the thing.

3. What hobbies other than reading and journaling do you have?

I bake things. I cook things. When I'm feeling sane enough, I play the piano. Sometimes I paint things, more along the lines of decoration than art. I hike. When I have the chance, I swim, although that one has been getting less attention lately. I do yoga, although that one lives on the borderline between "hobby" and "basic bodily maintenance."

4. City, suburb, or country?

City or suburb. Not exurb. Not country. I like having stuff close. Probably suburb, because even the areas I like in the city are not in the city, they are within city limits, which is different. The area around Lake Nokomis, for example, was where we did a lot of our house-hunting, and it's Mpls-proper but not really very urban. I don't want an apartment. I don't like apartments. Apartment buildings have other people in them that I didn't invite to be there. They slam doors and yell at each other and lift weights in the wee hours of the morning so you hear a mysterious "chink...chink...chink..." and don't know what it is until the guy upstairs moves his weight bench out with him. They make noises tht sound like drey-erase markers for hours at a time. No more apartments for me. The area between our house and our neighbors' house relaxes me with its presence.

If I had to pick a location for an ideal house, it would be around Lake of the Isles or on the River Road. But I'm happy enough driving what seems like a short distance by our California standards to see various friends.

5. What's your favorite vehicle?

One that runs. Seriously, I could possibly care less about cars, but it would take work. I would have to start getting serious antipathy going, and why bother? Our little Saturn, Zeph, is a good little car. We might get another car at some point. Hybrids are cool, and my dad's Volvo is an awfully comfortable car without having the boat-or-tank qualities of my mom's Buick. (My mom is too young to drive a Buick. My mom will not listen to me on this point.) But generally what I want is a car that will function and not make me pay attention to it. I took the car in for an oil change today, and I had to whack the stereo with my knee to make the driver's side speaker come back in, and that is as much attention as I usually want to pay my car.

I believe that's it for people asking me questions so far. If you want to do so and haven't, go on ahead.

Date: 2005-03-31 02:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
The St. Pete Co-op is good stuff, vegan available. For awhile there was also the Chestnut Tree: it was there when I was a freshman in the fall of '95, and it was so lovely. Victory Chili and pesto pizza and Lisa who knew when I came in the door what I was in the mood to drink and chocolate raspbery dessert. I miss the Tree, but it's gone there.

It sounds likely that you were there when [livejournal.com profile] markgritter was, since he arrived in the fall of '93.

The tornado took the hosta garden, but they replanted it.

Date: 2005-03-31 03:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] songwind.livejournal.com
Yes, in included fantasy. That is, in fact why I said SF rather than sci-fi. To me, SF means "speculative fiction" rather than "science fiction."

Date: 2005-03-31 03:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
I've heard that usage, and I've seen people use SF vs. sf to make that distinction.

I never use the term "sci-fi," except occasionally to distinguish schlock (some of which I like) from serious (some of which I like). I'm not in the category of fen who will correct people or issue pained sighs, but I am in the category who just avoids it as a general term, just in case.

Date: 2005-03-31 03:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] songwind.livejournal.com
I enjoy precision in communication. The SF/sci-fi/science fiction camps make that difficult. It vexes me. :)

I was involved for a while in an online writer's group where the moderators were "SF = speculative fiction, sci-fi is crap, science fiction is for real literature" obsessives, which is probably where I picked up the usage.

Correction

Date: 2005-03-31 03:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dd-b.livejournal.com
I was never at risk of an English major. Worry about it interfering with my reading prevented me from taking any English (literature) classes.

Film major, maybe; at least as a double with the math I did.

Legislative bumf

Date: 2005-03-31 03:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dsgood.livejournal.com
My state legislators can be counted on to oppose such nonsense. My part of South Minneapolis is left of San Francisco.

Date: 2005-03-31 11:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] writingortyping.livejournal.com
I'd be happy to be on the beta-reader list....

:-)

Date: 2005-03-31 12:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
I added you to the filter.

Re: Correction

Date: 2005-03-31 12:51 pm (UTC)

Re: Legislative bumf

Date: 2005-03-31 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Never hurts to support and/or thank them for behavior of which one approves.

Date: 2005-03-31 03:36 pm (UTC)
fiddledragon: (Default)
From: [personal profile] fiddledragon
ditto :)

Date: 2005-03-31 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Sillydragon! You already are!

Date: 2005-03-31 03:56 pm (UTC)
fiddledragon: (Default)
From: [personal profile] fiddledragon
Oh good :) I couldn't remember if I'd already asked - I know I did for the kids, but.....

Date: 2005-03-31 04:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cadithial.livejournal.com
Add me too please :)

Date: 2005-03-31 07:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dichroic.livejournal.com
I'm not sure if I've asked before or not, but would like to be.

please ask me too

Date: 2005-03-31 11:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greatestofnates.livejournal.com
1) Do you ever listen to books on tape/CD?

2) After they cast Jodie Foster and Keifer Sutherland for a movie about you and Mark's life - what (sub)genre(s) would it be?

3) If you could bring in a ghost-writer to slog through the hard parts of your book - who would you choose?

4) What do you think happens after people die? Is it relevant to how you live your life?

5) What should I have for dinner next Monday?

Re: Correction

Date: 2005-03-31 11:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gaaldine.livejournal.com
*sigh* In what ways would taking English classes -- or, heaven forbid, being an English major -- have affected your reading -- your thinking, interpreting, feeling, whatever -- that being a film major wouldn't?

Re: Correction

Date: 2005-03-31 11:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
They assign books. Then he has to read those books instead of the books he wants to read.

Date: 2005-03-31 11:53 pm (UTC)

Date: 2005-03-31 11:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
And done.

I'll probably post about this soon.

Re: Correction

Date: 2005-04-01 12:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gaaldine.livejournal.com
Oh, right. 'Cause other classes _don't_ assign books. Ever.

(Hmmm . . . email me if you want to talk more about this so I don't monopolize LJ space.)

Re: Correction

Date: 2005-04-01 12:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Are you trying to tell me that my physics grad school work had anything like the magnitude of reading as your English lit grad school work? Because if you are, I'm sorry, but I don't believe you.

I'm amazed that you're even arguing this point. You're the one who's often complaining about how many lovely things you don't get to read any more because your grad work has eaten your reading list. It's not that I'm (or [livejournal.com profile] dd_b, who is married to a former lit student, is) arguing that English classes are bad or that no one should take them or that they can't provide anything valuable to anybody. But I would think you would be first in line to testify that they provide a really large heck of a lot of reading material, and that that can dictate a fair amount of someone's reading time.

(I don't care about taking up lj space, but I'm not going to be at the computer most of the evening.)

Re: Correction

Date: 2005-04-01 04:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dd-b.livejournal.com
Sheer hours. Reading a dozen or so long novels in 10 weeks is a significant amount of time. A significant amount of time *more* than I'd have spent on a math class, for example, or a Russian language class, or an economics or psychology or philosophy class. Probably even more than the amount of time I spent on film projects -- and I had a special interest in film production, more than I had in literature classes.

I'm certainly not putting down being an English major. My wife of twenty-mumble years is one (and got a masters too, and is a writer), and my first college girlfriend was an English major.

Re: please ask me too

Date: 2005-04-01 01:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
1. When did you really get into gaming?
2. Is there anything you miss about living in St. Pete? In Wisconsin?
3. What one thing absolutely kills a movie for you?
4. How long does it take you to move into a new place? Are you all moved in now?
5. Do you think April Fool's jokes are generally funny, generally stupid, or about an even mix?

Re: Correction

Date: 2005-04-04 12:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gaaldine.livejournal.com
But I can't believe that your physics grad school work didn't take up your time in other ways (or that any other major doesn't take up a significant chunk o' time).

And there are always lovely things to read, and always more than I'm ever going to get to read. One of the advantages to my field is that I do get to read what I want. (I won't, however, argue that it would allow for everyone to read what s/he wanted, or that everyone should be an English major when there are so many other lovely majors to choose from.)

At any rate, studying "English" isn't as limiting as people sometimes think, especially once one is beyond the undergraduate level: if I wanted to read and write about manga exclusively right now, I could (and in fact there is a movement to get more manga in the university library so it can be incorporated into more undergraduate classes).

Re: Correction

Date: 2005-04-04 01:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gaaldine.livejournal.com
Ah. This cheers me considerably. It is ego flattery, really: my major required us to read 32 hours straight as we walked uphill in both directions in a blinding snowstorm . . . and I still managed to read eleven books straight-through, darn it all. Not like those sissy other majors out there. Physics, bah. What kind of work do those people studying physics do? Standing around in warm labs, getting cozy with their theories and equations . . .

Seriously, though, I do have some doubts about overall time consumption, but I'm willing to easily concede that time to undertake tasks is dependent on the person. The first year I spent getting my master's degree in English was probably the easiest in my life: I had to read several books a week, but that was *it*. I had more time than I knew what do with (although that quickly changed).

I'm sorry to be so defensive about English. I wasn't quite so defensive in the past, but having now spent several years in a doctoral program in it, I know how dangerous cultural attitudes and assumptions about it are: English departments and programs are under attack, losing funding, respect and all that jazz throughout the country. We just don't do anything "practical," and therefore, so the argument goes, we are irrelevant, a waste of time and money, etc. etc.

It makes me grumpy.

Re: Correction

Date: 2005-04-04 01:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
But once you've committed to formally studying one thing, it's very hard to bring in all the other things you might want to study. Some people try it, but I think it's not always good scholarly practice: some things really aren't relevant and need to wait until a major course of study is completed. There are good things about a formal study of any subject (well, any reasonable subject; a formal study of How People Act When I Kick Them is perhaps not so good), but there are also disadvantages.

And when my physics grad work took up huge chunks of my time, it was not with reading -- so when I got done and was ready to relax, I hadn't just spent N hours of my worktime reading, and it was pretty entirely available as a leisure activity. For some people this doesn't make a difference. For others it does.

Re: Correction

Date: 2005-04-04 02:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gaaldine.livejournal.com
Yup, yup. Agree, agree.

Re: Correction

Date: 2005-04-04 10:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dd-b.livejournal.com
Not having taken any, I don't actually *know* if the literature courses available to me would have *really* ended up cutting into my own reading. I reported the reason I didn't want to take them at the time; defending the decision I can perhaps do to some extent, but that's a separate issue :-).

The only big issue I had with what I understood the English department to be doing at Carleton when I was there, 1972-1977, was that I didn't care that much for some of the literature they wanted to teach about, and they didn't care anything at all about any of the literature that was actually important to me. I've heard a lot of complaints about generic "English departments" for doing things that that one certainly *didn't* do, and some more specific complaints that might be true but were about places I had no connection to and hence no way to check. So I don't have anything against English departments, at least more than any random SF fan is likely to.

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 4th, 2026 08:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios