I am behind on everything. You name it and it's still on my list to do. I am trying not to feel like a failure at everything, because I know that getting this puppy and starting to get her trained to be the kind of puppy we want to have (the kind who doesn't mess the rugs and chew the power cords constantly, for example; the kind people are reasonably glad to see, rather than the kind they avoid) is a major project, and she doesn't seem to think I'm failing at it at all, even when I feel like I've said "no" for the forty-leventh time this hour. I even did not manage to get a friend's birthday card out in time. I am not a person who does that. It alarms me.
I keep reminding myself that the main theoretical reason I am so organized and get things done promptly is not because then I feel better and can do more stuff (although that's probably the main actual reason) but so that if I have some combination of major projects come up, I can handle them without permanently falling behind on everything on the planet. And that spending time with the puppy is sometimes -- even often -- fun, but also qualifies as doing something productive at this stage of her training, so I really shouldn't feel guilty if one of my short stories doesn't get resubmitted for another day or two, or if the desk is a mass of clutter, or if the London pictures aren't all processed and written about and posted.
I even have all kinds of things I've been meaning to say on lj and haven't gotten around to. For example, I went to get a receiving blanket to serve as Ista's binkie, the morning before I went to get Ista. And I found two that were not explicitly and excessively gendered, out of dozens: the white fuzzy one I bought, and one with yellow and green stripes. And yah, okay, our language is gendered when it refers to sentients, so people are going to be more comfortable with cues that tip them off about which pronouns to use. But does every single object around a kid have to give these cues? Putting a girlbaby in a pink onesie isn't enough -- we have to have flowers and hearts all over it, a pink receiving blanket with flowers and hearts on it, pink booties, a ruffly hat, preferably a girly blanket and diaper bag? Because someone might be confused if we let her have green socks at the age of 2 weeks? Do I really care about the confusion of such people? Frankly, I do not.
And in the face of all this, many people will insist that if an 18-month-old does something, that counts as not socially influenced?
It may be that, in a perfectly equitable situation with no choice biased externally, 99% of little girls would prefer flowers and tiaras and 99% of little boys would prefer dumptrucks and helicopters. I think it's still important to make it a choice, to make sure that they have the chance to choose them. To make sure they can choose flowers and helicopters if they want to. Even if 100% of them reacted that way. If we're going to use color-coding to say what's "girl stuff" and "boy stuff," I don't think we need the additional roles appliqued on the blankets. Where are my pink helicopters, dammit? Where are my blue flowers?
It is going to be a long 18 years once we start the clock ticking (which, since I am of that age and marital status, I feel the need to reiterate that we have not). I don't know, maybe it's just that I have the time to fuss with a puppy, and a baby will take up so much energy that I'll say, "Hell with it, wrap the twerp in a gold-embroidered camo sarong if you want, but let's get out of the house already."
I keep reminding myself that the main theoretical reason I am so organized and get things done promptly is not because then I feel better and can do more stuff (although that's probably the main actual reason) but so that if I have some combination of major projects come up, I can handle them without permanently falling behind on everything on the planet. And that spending time with the puppy is sometimes -- even often -- fun, but also qualifies as doing something productive at this stage of her training, so I really shouldn't feel guilty if one of my short stories doesn't get resubmitted for another day or two, or if the desk is a mass of clutter, or if the London pictures aren't all processed and written about and posted.
I even have all kinds of things I've been meaning to say on lj and haven't gotten around to. For example, I went to get a receiving blanket to serve as Ista's binkie, the morning before I went to get Ista. And I found two that were not explicitly and excessively gendered, out of dozens: the white fuzzy one I bought, and one with yellow and green stripes. And yah, okay, our language is gendered when it refers to sentients, so people are going to be more comfortable with cues that tip them off about which pronouns to use. But does every single object around a kid have to give these cues? Putting a girlbaby in a pink onesie isn't enough -- we have to have flowers and hearts all over it, a pink receiving blanket with flowers and hearts on it, pink booties, a ruffly hat, preferably a girly blanket and diaper bag? Because someone might be confused if we let her have green socks at the age of 2 weeks? Do I really care about the confusion of such people? Frankly, I do not.
And in the face of all this, many people will insist that if an 18-month-old does something, that counts as not socially influenced?
It may be that, in a perfectly equitable situation with no choice biased externally, 99% of little girls would prefer flowers and tiaras and 99% of little boys would prefer dumptrucks and helicopters. I think it's still important to make it a choice, to make sure that they have the chance to choose them. To make sure they can choose flowers and helicopters if they want to. Even if 100% of them reacted that way. If we're going to use color-coding to say what's "girl stuff" and "boy stuff," I don't think we need the additional roles appliqued on the blankets. Where are my pink helicopters, dammit? Where are my blue flowers?
It is going to be a long 18 years once we start the clock ticking (which, since I am of that age and marital status, I feel the need to reiterate that we have not). I don't know, maybe it's just that I have the time to fuss with a puppy, and a baby will take up so much energy that I'll say, "Hell with it, wrap the twerp in a gold-embroidered camo sarong if you want, but let's get out of the house already."
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 10:50 pm (UTC)But considering who my kids' Mormor will be? They'll have their pink or blue covered, and I can go on to rainbows and denim and whatever else.
(We had an argument at my cousin's baby shower about whether a grey sweatshirt and a pair of jeans was a gender-neutral outfit for a baby. Everyone in my generation said it was, and everyone in my mom's or grandma's said it wasn't.)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 10:53 pm (UTC)I like the shock value of the people not knowing if it's a boy or a girl. Their world may end! *g*
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 10:59 pm (UTC)But I try to be understanding because it's one of the few known things about a kid that age, and because our language is only set up for circumlocution for the motivated. (I do make an effort to say things like, "What a sweet little one!" that don't rely on gender.)
And before anyone brings it up, I hate zie/zir as a gender-neutral pronoun, because it only works for the initiated: people who don't know that they are supposed to be listening for gender-neutral as well as gendered ones invariably, in my experience, hear "she/her."
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 11:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 11:46 pm (UTC)You've already commented on how poorly the zie/zir experiment has worked out. I suppose you could try reviving the Victorian convention of referring to babies and small children as "it." This would at least have the advantage of offending all the parents more or less equally, rather than just the half of them where you guessed the wrong gender.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 11:51 pm (UTC)(But then, I'm not sure she's ever stopped worrying about my gender differentiation, actually. The nagging in high school to wear makeup -- yikes. And so now I have short hair, live in jeans and t-shirts, and am generally makeup-free.)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 12:03 am (UTC)Don't challenge them.
B
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 12:15 am (UTC)I wouldn't be opposed to paisleys, plaids, geometric prints, stripes, or dots, but they were not as easy to find for infants. Some dots and stripes, but harder to find as we approach toddler sized clothes.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 01:25 am (UTC)And I have to say that I do only put the blue on my son, and the pink on my daughter. (Neutral colors go on either one, but I kind of keep it consistent as to which particular outfits.) Mostly, it's for my own ease. That way, I can tell which one it is even if I only see him/her out of the corner of my eye. The couple of times that I have put them in the same color, it's absolutely driven me nuts!
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 01:38 am (UTC)Puppies are glorious, and tough.
HAHAHA!!
Date: 2005-07-16 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 01:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 03:47 am (UTC)Heatah
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 04:03 am (UTC)color-coding the babies
Date: 2005-07-16 04:13 am (UTC)Some random lady stranger went to coo over her and asked LMH's name and age, using masculine pronouns. I replied offhandedly, "Oh, her name is [name] and she's (however old)."
The lady immediately turned defensive at learning LMH's true gender: "Well, I couldn't tell. She's in blue, after all."
In short, it doesn't matter what color you dress a very small baby. If strangers misread any cues (if there are any) and guess wrong, they will blame the mom and bite her head off.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 05:05 am (UTC)(Checks for pink icon, comes up blank.)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 07:13 am (UTC)We decided long ago that if she wanted dump trucks...she would get dump trucks. If she wanted dolls fine.
She has settled on an odd variety of dolls, building supplies, puzzles, and cars/planes. Oh...and the 8,000,000 stuffed animals and books.
Oh...and don't get me started on "Boys can't wear the light purple fantasy pajamas." =P
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 10:13 am (UTC)For blankets, he had lots of yellow and plaid.
I'm surprised there are so few choices where you are. Maybe it's because Reid was so big when born that he skipped the really-bitty baby clothes stage, or maybe it's a regional thing. I don't know.
We try not to make an issue of anything Reid chooses. So he's a purse-carrying, pink-boot-coveting, rough-and-tumble jock baby. Works for us.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 11:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 11:49 am (UTC)Re: HAHAHA!!
Date: 2005-07-16 11:51 am (UTC)Myself, I never did rebel. I do things that aren't what my parents would do, but they're for other reasons than that.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 11:54 am (UTC)My mom wanted me to wear makeup in high school, too, but it wasn't at all about gender differentiation. I wore flannel shirts, geek T-shirts, baggy jeans, and hiking boots for most of high school and college, and on me they became extremely femmey, because I am Just That Girly.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 11:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 11:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 12:01 pm (UTC)Teething is a beastly thing for her to have to combine with learning the rules of a new place. She just desperately needs to chew, and she desperately needs to explore, and sometimes the two combine just too well.
Re: color-coding the babies
Date: 2005-07-16 12:02 pm (UTC)I'm so looking forward to that.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 12:02 pm (UTC)In the interests of being tactful, let's just say we won't be doing that here.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 12:07 pm (UTC)I wouldn't dress a son in pink, either, unless he asked for it. I just don't like pink.
At
Re: HAHAHA!!
Date: 2005-07-16 12:18 pm (UTC)We raised Dylan very "nontraditionally" - I have baby pictures where he has a ponytail, and he wore every color, including pink, and to this day he's not ashamed to say when something's pretty. He's been exposed to, but never preferred, sports. He has several teddy bears that look very "girly" but he loves them to death, and we never had a problem with it. He's really a serious kid and very fascinated with science, and he doesn't put much stock in what other people say about things - if he likes something, he'll tell me "so what if Billy doesn't like that? He's not me. He doesn't have to like it. I'm a different person." He takes good care of Logan and will be a very well-balanced and nurturing guy. We're fine with it. So many people saw him playing with his baby doll when he was really little and would tell me "you know, you're going to MAKE him GAY by letting him play with that doll!" I couldn't believe how backwards people were...it was really sad that they were so locked into such ignorance.
I don't know how Dylan can rebel...just about anything goes in our house.
Re: HAHAHA!!
Date: 2005-07-16 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 06:04 pm (UTC)The baggy jeans and flannel shirts become extremely femmey on me, too, and the only person who didn't recognize it was my mother. In college, in fact, I tried to go butch. I really tried. Shaved my head and everything. I wound up looking waifish, adorable, and utterly femme with my shaved head, army jacket, and big punk boots. Femininity: it's an animal thing, not a fashion thing.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 05:42 pm (UTC)I had my newborn twins out in public, and the only clothes I had for them were ones that were bought by other people for them. I personally HATE HATE HATE pink, but that's all I had. So I had one kid in a pink onesie, with a pink cap, and a pink blanket. The other kid was in a blue onesie, a blue cap, and a blue blanket. their carseats each had a mickey mouse nametag on them saying "jake" and "marissa". and people STILL asked what their sex was!
when told they were boy/girl twins, I got the standard question "are they identical?" My standard answer "no, one has a penis, the other doesn't". I had no qualms about saying that too!
no subject
Date: 2005-07-20 02:48 am (UTC)Heathah