Commentary and bread
Oct. 3rd, 2006 07:31 amI'm sorry, folks: I'm disabling "anonymous" comments. I've deleted a number of anonymous spam comments this morning, and I just don't have time to keep doing it. There are at least three of you who have commented without lj accounts but signed your names, and I still want to hear from you when you have stuff to say -- I just don't have the time to sort through poker spam every two minutes or less (I timed it).
I will note that lj accounts are still free, so if you're one of those people, you could sign up for one without doing a friendslist or anything that might be more of a time sink. Or you can e-mail me with commentary -- that's always welcome.
Bleh. Stupid spammers. Again: genuine comments welcome, but I had to put a stop to the comment spam as much as I was able, for time management purposes.
In other news, I have often described baking as the anti-writing for me, for balance. But sometimes it has a few things in common. Why was the dough for the same recipe of bread with the same brands and mostly the same packages of ingredients better after one minute of knead this morning than after five minutes of knead a week ago today? More eager yeasties? This is like when one 3,000 word short story takes an afternoon and another takes a month. I'll take it, but I don't understand it.
I will note that lj accounts are still free, so if you're one of those people, you could sign up for one without doing a friendslist or anything that might be more of a time sink. Or you can e-mail me with commentary -- that's always welcome.
Bleh. Stupid spammers. Again: genuine comments welcome, but I had to put a stop to the comment spam as much as I was able, for time management purposes.
In other news, I have often described baking as the anti-writing for me, for balance. But sometimes it has a few things in common. Why was the dough for the same recipe of bread with the same brands and mostly the same packages of ingredients better after one minute of knead this morning than after five minutes of knead a week ago today? More eager yeasties? This is like when one 3,000 word short story takes an afternoon and another takes a month. I'll take it, but I don't understand it.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 01:08 pm (UTC)of course, if you knead by hand, no clue because I've always had too small of a kitchen to attempt.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 01:25 pm (UTC)The hand-knead is good because you can add water or flour or whatever by feel in realtime, instead of by trial and error on previous loaves. But it does take more work.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 01:54 pm (UTC)Incidentally, when I saw Elise yesterday, she raved and raved over the rosemary rolls. I am looking forward to trying the recipe sometime soon.
Bread
Date: 2006-10-03 02:15 pm (UTC)I've heard that bread machines are more trouble than they are worth - what's your opinion on this?
no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 03:35 pm (UTC)That sucks, anyhow, and I don't blame you for disabling anonymous under the circumstances. (Not that I would ever blame anyone for making whatever restrictions they felt a need for in their own journals. I suppose I meant, I have anonymous comments enabled, but under those circumstances, I'd probably disable them, too. I've finally stopped feeling intense loathing for spam in my e-mail, but that's about my limit.)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 04:24 pm (UTC)Sorry about the spaminators. That sucks.
Spammers
Date: 2006-10-04 12:09 am (UTC)I NEVER buy anything from an unsolicited offer, but that doesn't stop these pests. It's really out of control.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 02:20 am (UTC)I often (though not always) knead in large mixing bowls as well. Sometimes there is nothing like heaving the entire large hunk of bread dough at the countertop with all my strength, but cleanup, as you say, is an important consideration.
Re: Bread
Date: 2006-10-04 02:23 am (UTC)I wouldn't say they're trouble, really. Storage, sure, and expense. But mine isn't very fiddly.