Olympics post, take one
Feb. 14th, 2010 08:40 amI love the Olympics. Love love love the Olympics. I am happy enough with the Summer Olympics, but the Winter Olympics are the really good ones. In the last few days, I've tried a new-to-me restaurant, gone to two orchestra concerts, spent time with loved ones, cooked, and read books. But never mind that! Olympics!
Unfortunately I had the chance to use my rallying cry ("Shut up, Bob Costas!") within the first half-hour of watching coverage. I also thought it was really tacky that they called in Tom Brokaw to try to get Bode Miller to pay penance for not displaying enough emotion at the previous Olympics. Shut up, Bob Costas! Shut up, Tom Brokaw! Also, shut up, Bob Costas's moire-y sport coat! Shut up, Bob Costas's Hufflepuff Vikings fan tie!
And also, a memo to Carnival cruise lines: we have lots of boats here in Minnesota, so we are familiar with come-ons of various kinds that start, "Come on my boat and...." Very familiar. And let me tell you, "Come on my boat and get a wedgie," is not one that has been tested out as a winner. Really not. Mostly people hear that and go on someone else's boat. Just FYI.
markgritter was out of the room getting a snack, so he thought
timprov and I were joking based on the type of water slide they were showing or the expression on someone's face. No: actual ad boiling down to, "Come on our boat and get a wedgie." No thanks. Really, I'm good here.
And also, where are my ads for apple pie? I don't want boughten apple pie anyway, but there are ads for America and ads for, no kidding, mom. Blatant, in-your-face, subtlety-is-for-wusses ads for mom. So if we've got mom and America, where is apple pie? Advertisers owe me this.
I wouldn't have been watching these ads at all if the Slovakians had not sent their women's Mites team to the Olympics. What, were the PeeWees busy, Slovakians? What was that? In one of our brief interludes of watching the hockey game instead of the main channel with luge and moguls and short track,
timprov said, "Those girls don't even look like they're used to skating near other people." My alma mater was not a hockey powerhouse (we saved that for physics and tennis), but I tell you what, we'd have been ashamed to put a team like that on the ice. To take a page from Dr. Zoidberg's book, your hockey is bad, and you should feel bad!
It just offends me that these countries that have good men's teams cannot be arsed to actually teach their women hockey. Little girls are good at hockey if you let them be. They are tough and fierce and make awesome stubborn jaw-jutting little girl faces around their mouth guards when they are small enough that their goalie pads outweigh them by a factor of two. Their brothers there in Slovakia are playing decent hockey. Let the girls on the ice. Tell them it's good to be fierce and even better to be good enough that you don't lose, here, let me check since we turned back to other things...
...18-0? EIGHTEEN? TO ZERO? Come on, Slovakia. Come on. Your girls deserve better than this. Not that I don't like to see North American teams victorious. I do. I just like to feel like they would have had to have their heads in the game at least a little bit to get there.
Uff da Sam. 18-0. I can't even make a Bull Durham joke here. It's just too depressing. I will hope for better hockey soon. Very soon.
Unfortunately I had the chance to use my rallying cry ("Shut up, Bob Costas!") within the first half-hour of watching coverage. I also thought it was really tacky that they called in Tom Brokaw to try to get Bode Miller to pay penance for not displaying enough emotion at the previous Olympics. Shut up, Bob Costas! Shut up, Tom Brokaw! Also, shut up, Bob Costas's moire-y sport coat! Shut up, Bob Costas's Hufflepuff Vikings fan tie!
And also, a memo to Carnival cruise lines: we have lots of boats here in Minnesota, so we are familiar with come-ons of various kinds that start, "Come on my boat and...." Very familiar. And let me tell you, "Come on my boat and get a wedgie," is not one that has been tested out as a winner. Really not. Mostly people hear that and go on someone else's boat. Just FYI.
And also, where are my ads for apple pie? I don't want boughten apple pie anyway, but there are ads for America and ads for, no kidding, mom. Blatant, in-your-face, subtlety-is-for-wusses ads for mom. So if we've got mom and America, where is apple pie? Advertisers owe me this.
I wouldn't have been watching these ads at all if the Slovakians had not sent their women's Mites team to the Olympics. What, were the PeeWees busy, Slovakians? What was that? In one of our brief interludes of watching the hockey game instead of the main channel with luge and moguls and short track,
It just offends me that these countries that have good men's teams cannot be arsed to actually teach their women hockey. Little girls are good at hockey if you let them be. They are tough and fierce and make awesome stubborn jaw-jutting little girl faces around their mouth guards when they are small enough that their goalie pads outweigh them by a factor of two. Their brothers there in Slovakia are playing decent hockey. Let the girls on the ice. Tell them it's good to be fierce and even better to be good enough that you don't lose, here, let me check since we turned back to other things...
...18-0? EIGHTEEN? TO ZERO? Come on, Slovakia. Come on. Your girls deserve better than this. Not that I don't like to see North American teams victorious. I do. I just like to feel like they would have had to have their heads in the game at least a little bit to get there.
Uff da Sam. 18-0. I can't even make a Bull Durham joke here. It's just too depressing. I will hope for better hockey soon. Very soon.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 03:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 03:51 pm (UTC)The speed skating and moguls were awesome, though. And I got to have any interesting conversation with a non-sports-fan about why sports are valuable for me to watch, which featured explanations of the goodness of speed skating and moguls compared to the dullness (to me) of luge, golf and televised poker.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 04:03 pm (UTC)I am examining my reaction to Slovakia's suckage vs. the Chinese having a team at all, and I think it's that there are not lots and lots of Chinese guys in the NHL, and I think there could be. I think there's no reason why the Chinese can't play hockey just as well as anybody else if they want to. So when the Chinese field a women's team, I say, "Yay, more hockey for everybody!" But the Slovakians already have hockey. Just not for women, apparently.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 04:43 pm (UTC)Did you see the bit where the Slovakian goalie just ... fell over? For no apparent reason? It made me sad, and that was when I decided it was high time for a snack.
(Then there was short track speed skating. I'm sorry, make that: Short! Track! Speed! Skating! Whee!!)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 05:00 pm (UTC)You're entirely right that Slovakia knows how to develop good hockey players and it sucks that little girls mostly don't get that chance. People outside the women's hockey community were astonished to discover at first that there was no Russian team, and then that the early Russian teams were embarrassingly ill-equipped.
The Slovakians are doing one of the easiest short-cuts to developing a competitive national team - they encourage their best players to play US college hockey and/or to play on Canadian club teams. This is easier and cheaper than creating the kind of sport culture at home where thousands of children get ice time and good coaching.
Every time I see an early-round blowout like this, I wonder about the balance between promoting development of the sport in those nations and risking losing credibility in the wider Olympic movement. After Italy, they decided to no longer allow automatic entry to the host team. But they didn't decide to move the tournament back from 8 teams to 6.
Um, I probably haven't talked to you enough that you're familiar with my credentials as a women's hockey organizer and advocate and daughter of same, so you're probably wondering where this lecture came from. I hope you won't take it amiss.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 06:21 pm (UTC)That said, it's a lot easier for V. to understand what's going on (and see the puck) when, uh, only one team seems to be playing. So that's handy.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-15 02:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-15 02:33 am (UTC)I reached the point a couple of Olympics ago where I decided to just cheer for everybody.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-15 04:10 am (UTC)Does the approach you're describing the Slovakians as using actually work for anybody? Is it a good stepping stone to a real program? Or is it just the cheap way that sort of frustrates people and doesn't really work out?
no subject
Date: 2010-02-15 04:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-15 01:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-15 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 12:17 am (UTC)This year at the juniors, Canada beat Kasakhstan 16-0. Yes, eventually it gets a bit much (although the +/- tiebreaker, see Finland vs the Czechs, means they have to). The only difference, with the men, is that there's about 4-5 "top" countries, and another 3-4 A- class countries, to go with the two or three B-class countries in the 12-team pool. Unfortunately, two teams demote to the second division every year, and two teams from that second division get their year in the sun (made black by sheer volume of pucks aimed at them).
Because women's hockey as an internationally-notable sport is relatively new - the first girls that wanted to play hockey, instead of ringette, were fighting their battles when I was growing up - there are fewer development programs; and it's the second generation of players that can actually play. So there's Canada and the USA, and a distant look back to third place (Sweden or Finland, depending on the day). And from those two teams to the also-rans is an equally big gulf. But I'll give 12 years for there to be two powerhouses, two "win would be an upset, but not surprising" teams, and three or four "will lose, but will hold their own". And a couple of also-rans, who will be being beaten 8-0, 7-1...by the Slovak women. And it won't surprise me if I'm being pessimistic.
It's not fun to beat up a team; it's not fun to be beat up that badly; it's not really fun to watch. But Tomcikova let in 18, 6, 5, and 3 goals - on 67, 48, 45, and 32 shots. Apart from the Canada game (which she was still impressive, given the lack of defence), those are pretty decent save percentage totals, on a team that is totally outclassed. Given real defence in front of her, and you could see a totally different world. Give it a few years, and she'll get the defence.
Frankly, this is something I've never understood about US College Football - for the top teams, 50+point wins aren't unusual, and there are only about 5 "real" games out of the 11, games they have a chance to lose. But the stadia are still packed...
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 12:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 12:41 am (UTC)It made me saddest of all when we were watching figure skating, which is usually not my thing, and the US coverage was showing pictures of Sale and Pelletier (a.k.a. The Only Pairs Skaters I Have Ever Loved) doing coverage for the Canadians. So I knew that their commentary was there, and probably non-obnoxious, and I couldn't hear it. Feh.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 12:42 am (UTC)A 50+ point win in US football is like a 7+ point win in hockey--but I take your point, those are just not fun either.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 03:04 am (UTC)Another interesting note is that Canadian national teams are always older than US teams, on average. In Canada, elite women players play on community club teams with no age limit. In the USA, most elite women's hockey is on college teams. So after the US players graduate, unless they can get coaching jobs or unless they move to Canada, they don't really have somewhere to play.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 12:21 pm (UTC)I mean, granted, getting pregnant, having to save your boyfriend from the Queen of Air and Darkness, and becoming an ice-witch is a somewhat atypical reaction to, "What do I do without elite hockey in my life?"--one might even say drastic--but the problem is there all the same.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 06:27 pm (UTC)I have lots to say about shootouts, but it can be summed up in one word: No. Slightly longer: Ties are a reasonable, valid result, except in the KO rounds, and at that point, 4v4 overtime until someone scores. Yeah, 5 periods to win the semi makes it harder to win the final, but, if that's how good your team is, there it is.
The only good thing - and I'm not sure it's actually good - about shootouts is that goalies have much more practise in stopping penalty shots, so they're less fearsome now when they happen in real hockey.
On blowouts - what gets me in football is that a) the blowouts get scheduled (apart from classic rivalries that are currently seriously biased, but still have to be played), b) that they sell out, and c) that there doesn't seem to be the furore over "fixing" the college football schedule (on this topic, at least - I realize discussions over fixing NCAA football are legion) that exists over inviting the also-rans into international hockey.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 06:30 pm (UTC)