mrissa: (Wait -- what?)
[personal profile] mrissa
The book I'm reading begins,

"Since the history of the capital city of Britain's dearest ally has never* been told in the English language, I have ventured--greatly daring--to repair that regrettable omission."

*as of 1955.

Guess what city I'm reading about.

Date: 2010-09-12 08:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marydell.livejournal.com
Hmmm I'm going to say Cleopolis.

Date: 2010-09-12 08:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] swan-tower.livejournal.com
I'll guess Paris, though I'd be stunned if there were no English-language histories of that city prior to 1955.

Date: 2010-09-12 08:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barondave.livejournal.com
I'm going the snarky route and say: The US.

Date: 2010-09-12 08:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] txanne.livejournal.com
Yes, for had they meant Ottawa, they would have phrased it differently.

...oh, surely not Edinburgh.

Date: 2010-09-12 08:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dhole.livejournal.com
Moscow?

I think the funniest part is the number of cities it couldn't possibly be.

Date: 2010-09-12 09:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
I gave the copyright date mostly to rule out some of the options; [livejournal.com profile] timprov guessed Kyoto until I said the year.

Date: 2010-09-12 09:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mastadge.livejournal.com
Knowing you, and guessing that it's not going to be the obvious, I'm going with somewhere Nordic. Sweden? Norway? Denmark?

Date: 2010-09-12 09:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mastadge.livejournal.com
Whoops. Cities. Stockholm, Oslo, Copenhagen?

Date: 2010-09-12 09:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joeboo-k.livejournal.com
This is tough, because you'd think that a British writer would also consider historical conflicts before saying "dearest" - which makes me wonder who can possibly be left.

Bern.

But I really want to say Madrid. Except the writer would have to have been in an opium den, with a hookah in hand, to refer to Madrid in that manner.

Date: 2010-09-12 09:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joeboo-k.livejournal.com
I'd also be stunned for an Englishman to refer to France as "Britain's dearest ally" :)

Date: 2010-09-12 09:28 pm (UTC)
ext_6283: Brush the wandering hedgehog by the fire (Default)
From: [identity profile] oursin.livejournal.com
Lisbon - though oldest, rather than dearest, I would have said.

Date: 2010-09-12 09:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] swan-tower.livejournal.com
That's why I picked it! The header on Mrissa's post makes me think the country in question is one that was not usually viewed as their dearest ally.

Date: 2010-09-12 09:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adrian-turtle.livejournal.com
In 1955? Riyadh.

Date: 2010-09-12 10:14 pm (UTC)

Date: 2010-09-12 10:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mkille.livejournal.com
I also would guess Lisbon, and then just to play the odds, Helsinki.

Date: 2010-09-12 10:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dsmoen.livejournal.com
It's certainly not Dublin.

Date: 2010-09-12 10:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stillnotbored.livejournal.com
1955? Close enough to the end of the war to be Washington D.C. in the U.S. and for the feelings between the two countries to still be warm and fuzzy, especially with the cold war going on, which rules out Moscow. Not Paris, France, ever. Not any country in the commonwealth either.

I think I'm stumped. I can not imagine who a British writer would call a dearest ally. :/

The *where* now?

Date: 2010-09-12 10:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coho29.livejournal.com
Cardiff? Delhi?

Date: 2010-09-12 11:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] diatryma.livejournal.com
That was my guess because it was so interestingly not right.

Date: 2010-09-13 12:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katallen.livejournal.com
Well there is the possibility the author meant 'not the cheapest' as in costliest :)

(I just can't quite go with Washington DC not having an English language history - unless, of course, they meant in English not Amglish :D )

Date: 2010-09-13 12:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dsgood.livejournal.com
Lisbon?

Date: 2010-09-13 01:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dsmoen.livejournal.com
On the other hand: Belfast is not technically a part of Britain.

"The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland."

So....

I'm going with Belfast.

Date: 2010-09-13 01:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cakmpls.livejournal.com
Cape Town?

Date: 2010-09-13 02:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zunger.livejournal.com
Barsoom?

Date: 2010-09-13 03:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dd-b.livejournal.com
Elfland?

Re: The *where* now?

Date: 2010-09-13 03:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buttonlass.livejournal.com
I was going to say Delhi! Closest ally = Imperial underlings.

Date: 2010-09-13 04:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skzbrust.livejournal.com
Budapest, of course.

Date: 2010-09-13 04:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] biguglymandoll.livejournal.com
In 1955, with no English language history? I was going to go with Cairo, but I'm sure there was an English history... I give.

Date: 2010-09-13 06:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ashnistrike.livejournal.com
I'm going with Moscow or Capetown, for greatest irony. So...?

Date: 2010-09-13 08:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shewhomust.livejournal.com
Ah, that was my thought, too. Do we have any dear allies? I'd have thought we were too superior for that!

Date: 2010-09-13 11:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adrian-turtle.livejournal.com
Wonderful idea!

Date: 2010-09-13 03:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rmnilsson.livejournal.com
I ran this past my British coworker (who was a child in 1955). Her responses were probably more interesting than mine, so here they are...

She didn't think any Brit would use the word "ally" for a Commonwealth country, like Canada or Australia - they're closer than that. She made a face at the notion of France, and thought that was too soon after WWII for anyone in Britain to use that term for Germany. She didn't think anywhere in South America or Asia would be powerful enough in 1945 to warrant that kind of closeness with the UK.

She then spent a few minutes pondering whether that would be too far into the Cold War for it to be Moscow. Also whether someone would post this question if the answer would be the predictable answer of Washington DC.

So, assuming this author's notion of "dearest ally" is not far from the general British notions of the time, and assuming they actually identified the city as capitol correctly (i.e. it's not New York City), my guesses are Washington DC and Moscow.

Date: 2010-09-13 10:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cattitude.livejournal.com
I'll go with New Delhi. It was (technically) established as a city in 1911. Most capital cities were enough older than that that someone would have written about them in English somewhere along the line.

Date: 2010-09-14 01:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mamapduck.livejournal.com
Throw me in the Delhi group.

Date: 2010-09-16 01:51 am (UTC)

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
1112131415 1617
18192021222324
252627 28293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 31st, 2026 04:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios