Date: 2015-02-08 03:33 am (UTC)
Sure, and I don't find that an unreasonable terminology. I'm just noting "fiction of the fantastic" as one possible meaning of "fantasy," and one that's well defined as a taxon. A category that includes genre fantasy, and science fiction up to a particular reader's/viewer's cutoff point of "not rigorous enough"—like E. E. Smith saying that the Lensman series was science fiction but the Skylark series was not—strikes me as taxonomically bad in the same way that "invertebrate" is taxonomically bad: There is no actual trait that all invertebrates have in common that all animals don't have in common.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
111213 14 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 20th, 2025 04:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios