(no subject)
Mar. 9th, 2005 11:03 pmAre all writers cranky, horrible, disagreeable people deep down and sometimes on the surface, too? Or is it just me?
Seriously, I'm just feeling like disagreeing with everything in the last few days. I disapproved of the population of St. Louis Park today. 44K seemed extravagant for them. They could have done as much with 30K, I thought. That is the level of disagreeable I am.
And then I get two people who loff me well expressing excitement about their impending firstreader status, and what do I say to them? I say, "You'll be sorrrrrry!"
So I ask again: all writers? Or just me?
Seriously, I'm just feeling like disagreeing with everything in the last few days. I disapproved of the population of St. Louis Park today. 44K seemed extravagant for them. They could have done as much with 30K, I thought. That is the level of disagreeable I am.
And then I get two people who loff me well expressing excitement about their impending firstreader status, and what do I say to them? I say, "You'll be sorrrrrry!"
So I ask again: all writers? Or just me?
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 05:08 am (UTC)I do think that writers are often maybe more aware of when they're being cranky, horrible, etc., though.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 12:51 am (UTC)Writing
Date: 2005-03-10 06:02 am (UTC)I prefer to spin that as the talent of writing being our soul shining through, and that there are many aspects to a soul, so different parts come out at different times. It's sort of a distillation of ourselves, whatever we've got running through our heads.
On the onther hand, it could just be that writing is a good way to channel aggression and darker emotions somewhere healther.
:)
Mack
Re: Writing
Date: 2005-03-10 01:35 pm (UTC)I think that some people are better people when they're writing and some are worse people. Some people distill self, and some people write from very specific chunks. Some channel aggression and dark emotions with writing; others feed them that way.
I know someone who essentially killed her musical gift by using it only to deal with a massive grief in her life. This makes me extremely wary of using my writing primarily as an emotional outlet. I tell stories. Sometimes they're cathartic in one direction or another, but when they aren't, I still tell stories, because that's what I do.
Blights Upon the Landscape
Date: 2005-03-11 04:19 am (UTC)"The Filth," however, was not only barely comprehensible in plot, but also included too many of Morrison's preoccupations that he should have kept to himself. I know we write about the things that interest us, but there was one particular sexual fantasy, inserted gratuitously in the middle of the plot, that did nothing but leave a very nasty taste in my mind. Far too many pages were spent illustrating this (which I won't describe except to say Im fairly open minded but open degradation tends to disturb me), and it didn't further the plot. The readers could already tell that the character orchestrating the fantasy was the villain, because he had previously arranged for the social breakdown of an ocean liner. Showing "onscreen" how the villain lived out the rest of his fantasies seemed unnecessary.
I'm going to hope this was an aberration from a usually good writer, and that an editor will catch gratuitousness next time.
I've tried al sorts of writing: I've tried to distill, I've written from preoccupations, and I've channeled my darker emotions and fed them that way. But I've come to agree with you that using writing as mainly an emotional outlet is dangerous. Once you start over-identifying with characters, writing yourself constantly into the story, and doing things to serve an emotional need, you neglect the tale. I wound up disliking my talent when I did this.
Some emotions need outlets, true, but writers shouldn't neglect the work to fulfill a fantasy. There are many places a person dwells in their mind; that doesn't mean they need to stay there. Building a story can be therapeutic in its own right. I'd like to try to take that philosophy and begin again on my own pieces.
Mack
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 06:09 am (UTC)That is, exacto knives (sans sanguinary stuff, of course). Exacto blade-holders, to be, well, exact. I've got 50-odd blades upstairs and a sheet of marbled paper ready to turn into prayer cards if I could only figure out where the hell I left the damn holders, and then I can go to bed and not be cranky at harmless sheets of fancy paper that can't help it if they don't come in neatly trimmed 5" x 8" rectangles.
*stomp* *stew* *stomp* *stomp* *slam*
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 04:34 pm (UTC)(I love this job!)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:48 pm (UTC)I do wonder if I am feeling so cranky because I am in the U.S. (and specifically in NYC). That is the hope, at any rate.
But then the crankiness will just hide deeper down and not be so close tot he surface.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:03 pm (UTC)Plus, I consider the 'you'll be soooooorrrry' to be a standard warning when I send anything of mine that's ready for alpha readers out onto the workshop.
These days, Roo is aware enough and able to comment:
"Mommy? Are... areyou... GRUMPY?"
Nothing like an editorial toddler.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:08 pm (UTC)Oh, wait: that's not a problem.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 12:53 am (UTC)Speaking of the Psychic Illness Link, I want you to know that I've valiantly fought off a cold each from M and T, so I'm doing my best for the team.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:01 pm (UTC)I don't think
As for myself; only when things are going poorly with the writing. Or worse, not at all. Then yes, I can be cranky, horrible, and generally disageeable.
hhmm
I wonder if this is why writers tend to work alone.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:23 pm (UTC)Drop that into your sampling and see how it boils down.
Always the test-result outlier,
Chris
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:31 pm (UTC)So maybe. Hm.
Chris
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:44 pm (UTC)I'm cranky two weeks out of the month, cranky when I'm hungry, and cranky when silly things (husbands, children, cats, work) come between me and writing. And sometimes cranky for other reasons, too.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:52 pm (UTC)Also, it is widely known that Harlan Ellison is very cranky in general, and Eric Flint seemed like quite the crankster. Larry Niven had a vague air of dissatisfaction with the existence of other humans. OTOH, anecdotal evidence suggests that Roger Zelazny may very well have been the Boddhisatva of Compassion, and Monte Cook is very pleasant.
I think it's a YMMV issue.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 03:00 pm (UTC)Then again, I think I'm the most cranky when I haven't been writing for a week (or a month), though that's probably mostly because I become so darn frustrated with myself.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 03:37 pm (UTC)I can't decide whether it's better to splice other work in with the revisions to try to mitigate the cranky or whether it's better to just go through with them all and get the cranky over with all at once.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 04:51 pm (UTC)That is a very good point . . .
And a corollary to that is that I've been least happiest in jobs where everyone around me is treating their work as "just a job." So there's good crankiness, where I'm stomping around because I'm frustrated with how the words/images aren't cooperating but know that I'm ultimately doing my best in something that has a good chance of mattering to other people (or at least entertaining them, or making some aspect of their lives a bit easier or more interesting), as opposed to the angry misery that comes from working with people who don't give a flying fig about anything other than how much the world "owes" them.
(Hm. I think some other stuff got tangled into that knot of incoherence there. Don't mind me, I'm going to slink off and throw around some paint. . .)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 04:51 pm (UTC)As a writer-type person, I'm cursed with the evil Think Addiction which results in the disagreeable Opinion Formation. It's inescapable.
But FWIW, I don't find you the least bit disagreeable. :-)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 08:06 pm (UTC)I think it's March, myself. The "Spring -- No! Winter! -- No! Spring! -- Neener!" month.
P.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 12:57 am (UTC)There's a Dar Williams song with the line, "Can we live through February?" And I argue with the song when it comes on the CD (because I am disagreeable and) because February is a total piker of a month compared to January, when I go totally batshit insane, and March, when I only wish I was totally batshit insane.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 05:15 am (UTC)No, never mind. The spring and autumn make up for it.
Perhaps your miniature coffee machine would prefer the attic for its storage. Or maybe a dark cupboard. Or the back porch. My keys have preferences, I sure know that.
P.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 01:40 pm (UTC)The attic is where we keep Uncle Frank's corpse, so I think the coffee machine's options are the basement and the laundry room. It may prefer the back porch, but it is the coffee machine and I am the Mris, so I win.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 11:45 pm (UTC)Oh, and I get particularily cranky with everything when I'm stressed out about not doing things well enough by my own standards.
Heathah
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-12 03:28 am (UTC)Heathah