1. A series of websites on the theme, "What we don't know about ________." The blanks would be filled in with things like "astrophysics" and "prehistory in the region that became modern Turkey" and so on. Experts could get into big arguments about how we do so know X/no we do not. It would be lovely.
2. A movie about a women's hockey team that is not about them being women.
3. Book contracts for everybody! Well, not everybody. Everybody I like who writes books. Including me. And good book contracts, too, not the kind where I pay them $1000 and get stacks of my book with blurry printing.
4. A joke that begins, "A priest, a rabbi, and a mathematician." Somebody suggested that Mr. Ford is the person to ask about this, but I haven't seen him since and don't see him often. NB: This should be a funny joke.
5. A history of the rise of geek culture. (Note how I am not listing the finished versions of books I know you people are working on. Because I'm not eager? No. Because I'm deliberately not being pushy.)
6. An arctic fox charm. Kind of round, ivory-colored, curled in on itself, only slightly bigger than my whale-and-planet in "Warded." So I could wear Ansa Nikkanen's necklace from Thermionic Night.
7. Embroidered shirts and/or skirts that do not have spangles. Spangles fall off in the wash. I love the kind of embroidered shirts and/or skirts they're selling this year, but damned if I'm going to add three T-shirts a week to the hand-wash load just so that they last out the season looking reputable.
8. Chicken soup and oatmeal raisin cookies.
Hmmm. One of these things is not like the others. I guess I'm making chicken soup and oatmeal raisin cookies today.
What would you like, in the category of the first seven: reasonable-sounding things that you can't just run out and buy or make for yourself?
2. A movie about a women's hockey team that is not about them being women.
3. Book contracts for everybody! Well, not everybody. Everybody I like who writes books. Including me. And good book contracts, too, not the kind where I pay them $1000 and get stacks of my book with blurry printing.
4. A joke that begins, "A priest, a rabbi, and a mathematician." Somebody suggested that Mr. Ford is the person to ask about this, but I haven't seen him since and don't see him often. NB: This should be a funny joke.
5. A history of the rise of geek culture. (Note how I am not listing the finished versions of books I know you people are working on. Because I'm not eager? No. Because I'm deliberately not being pushy.)
6. An arctic fox charm. Kind of round, ivory-colored, curled in on itself, only slightly bigger than my whale-and-planet in "Warded." So I could wear Ansa Nikkanen's necklace from Thermionic Night.
7. Embroidered shirts and/or skirts that do not have spangles. Spangles fall off in the wash. I love the kind of embroidered shirts and/or skirts they're selling this year, but damned if I'm going to add three T-shirts a week to the hand-wash load just so that they last out the season looking reputable.
8. Chicken soup and oatmeal raisin cookies.
Hmmm. One of these things is not like the others. I guess I'm making chicken soup and oatmeal raisin cookies today.
What would you like, in the category of the first seven: reasonable-sounding things that you can't just run out and buy or make for yourself?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 01:05 pm (UTC)Yanno, #1 could be done easily. well, the set up could. it's just getting actual experts to come in and argue...
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 02:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 02:24 pm (UTC)I don't like carbonation and don't do well with caffeine, so if you do manage to murder the correct person, I will give you my share of the diet caffeinated grape sodas. I would like to note that this makes it extremely unlikely that I am the person you should murder to get said soda.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 01:47 pm (UTC)Also, I want to be able to get decaf iced tea without having to make it myself. This should not be nearly as difficult as it is.
Re #6: Are you thinking sort of like the Firefox symbol, only more arctic-y?
And is the silver dragon bracelet still on the list? 'Cause I always look for it when I'm in such a place, but have yet to find the right one.
*This time.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 02:27 pm (UTC)Yes, the silver dragon bracelet is still on the list. Especially if it's solid and kind of the Viking prow kind of dragon. Especially now that I'm writing -- oh crap.
Ahem. Anyway, the Firefox symbol is a bit too stylized, but not a lot too stylized. And yes, more arctic-y, less, um, fire-y.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 03:38 pm (UTC)What did you do?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 10:14 pm (UTC)Although I can hear exactly how you intone that phrase, and it makes me giggle.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 07:35 pm (UTC)Thing is, CMS seems to be involved in researching all sorts of things along those lines (gaming, comics storytelling, fan-culture, etc...) and since I haven't even started there yet, I'm not entirely sure how well my research and classes are going to be able to acommodate a life-consuming project like that. (To say nothing of the other books I'm working on.)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 10:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 02:30 pm (UTC)I hope that it gets better once they're doing summer and not spring.
Breakfast is also good, but you can bet that I've had breakfast before I post on lj, because if I don't have breakfast, I fall over. Which is not conducive to posting on lj, mostly.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 03:07 pm (UTC)Summer will be better, but seems to be composed of mostly blue, black and white.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 03:25 pm (UTC)I can wear blue and black, and sometimes some white. What I cannot wear is just white. I too nearly match the outfit at that point.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 05:08 pm (UTC)I don't like to think about what I want. A lack of rain today would be good, but it's too late for that.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 04:00 pm (UTC)My chicken soup (tomorrow) willl not have lemon but will have matzo balls.
And finally, what I really want is a line of clothing, or better several lines, with larger arms, armholes and legs to allow for women who work out.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 10:13 pm (UTC)Men who work out and who have certain genetic backgrounds sometimes have the leg/arm problem in fitted clothing as well. Very sad for all concerned. Some boots (not clothes, but still) are narrow enough that I wonder who their target audience is, because granted my legs are not birdy legs, but most American women are heavier proportional to their height than I am, and surely they have something for calves.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 10:20 pm (UTC)I was around 112 lbs. I was 5'1". I walked everywhere but didn't do weightlifting or anything like that. I mean, how big could they possibly have been?
Not to mention, way to please the customers, dude.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-23 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-23 05:29 pm (UTC)This line is probably out there, but I haven't found it yet.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-23 10:02 pm (UTC)My sister, you are among friends here.
No one ever wonders how I manage to stand upright; I'm not that busty either. Just enough to make nothing fit right, ever.
Well, not nothing. But it's difficult.
(One of my major problems is that I have a large enough cup size paired with a small enough band size that many bra manufacturers assume I don't exist. I'm too skinny for "full-figured," too busty for "normal." Fabulous. Clothing isn't actually made for skinny girls with breasts. It's made to make other people look like they're skinny girls with breasts.)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-23 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-24 01:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 03:36 pm (UTC)A silver or copper coiled-dragon bracelet to go around my upper arm that fits.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-24 04:15 am (UTC)It can be immensely time-consuming and frustrating, and it's not for people who don't pick up technical vocab quickly. But it's where the experts are, and the lovely fights (couched in even lovelier language sometimes).
no subject
Date: 2005-04-24 01:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 03:27 am (UTC)It is very strange re-reading what I've written. I somehow don't think of what I was writing about as research. I realise it is is research, but in my brain, that's a different thing, somehow.
Thanks for pointing out to me that I have a weird mental category of stuff-that-is-research-that-I-don't-think-of-as-research. Hopefully I can avoid future offense.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 01:32 pm (UTC)As for kinds of research, I got used to the contemporary-journal-articles kind when I was preparing to do the lab kind, but writing fiction can make for extremely broad types of "research." I'm curious now: what's your default kind of research? If you picture someone doing research, what are they doing?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 11:21 am (UTC)I think the difference is: I think it's research if I have a specific goal, for an externally-measurable task (so, get up to date with the literature on carotenoid cleavage in bacteria, or find descriptions of sequence alignment methods suitable for my second-year undergraduates to read).
But often I'm researching just to satisfy my own curiosity, and following stuff where it leads, and that doesn't feel like research. It feels more like reading friendslists in LJ. It's the stuff that's all grist to the mill of my attempt to understand, and there is no specific aim, although in the long run, both knowing lots of stuff and being able to find out lots of stuff are useful.
I hope that makes some vague kind of sense.