Questions from Juliansinger and Dichroic
Aug. 25th, 2011 11:05 amFrom
juliansinger:
1) When you’re roadtripping (which I suppose you kind of are but I understand this more as a visit than a roadtrip), do you prefer a) car, b) train, c) something else? Why?
No, I'm home now. But anyway.
The thing is, I love trains. I love train travel. But I live in the Upper Midwest of the US. There are some places I could get to on a train very conveniently, and others...less so. Quite a bit less so. Amtrak is not run by people who believe in the fervent desire of great numbers of Americans to go places by rail, and I am sad to say that they are right to hold this doubt, yet at the same time it contributes to the problem. It would be entirely sensible to go to Denver by train, and I would have truly liked to do so earlier this summer. And yet my understanding is that in order to get from Minneapolis to Denver, one must first go east as far as Chicago. Unless one can say, "Splendid, here's a list of things I've always wanted to do in Chicago, and I have the time, money, and energy to extend the trip by that far, nor does doing so interfere with important commitments and responsibilities," that is just not a feasible course of action. So while I would say trains in a heartbeat, trains wouldn't actually get me all the places I would like to be, so I don't want to have to choose between them and cars.
Not buses, though. Good heavens, not buses. My godfather's wife and her parents have gone by coach tour from Los Angeles to Mount Rushmore. They have done this more than once. I am fond of Hsin-yi and very glad she married my godfather, but: this is insane. This is not the behavior of a stable person. Oh, did I mention that after they went by coach there, they had to come by coach back again? This seems relevant somehow. Coach tour from Los Angeles to Mount Rushmore, uff da, death first.
( and nine more )
1) When you’re roadtripping (which I suppose you kind of are but I understand this more as a visit than a roadtrip), do you prefer a) car, b) train, c) something else? Why?
No, I'm home now. But anyway.
The thing is, I love trains. I love train travel. But I live in the Upper Midwest of the US. There are some places I could get to on a train very conveniently, and others...less so. Quite a bit less so. Amtrak is not run by people who believe in the fervent desire of great numbers of Americans to go places by rail, and I am sad to say that they are right to hold this doubt, yet at the same time it contributes to the problem. It would be entirely sensible to go to Denver by train, and I would have truly liked to do so earlier this summer. And yet my understanding is that in order to get from Minneapolis to Denver, one must first go east as far as Chicago. Unless one can say, "Splendid, here's a list of things I've always wanted to do in Chicago, and I have the time, money, and energy to extend the trip by that far, nor does doing so interfere with important commitments and responsibilities," that is just not a feasible course of action. So while I would say trains in a heartbeat, trains wouldn't actually get me all the places I would like to be, so I don't want to have to choose between them and cars.
Not buses, though. Good heavens, not buses. My godfather's wife and her parents have gone by coach tour from Los Angeles to Mount Rushmore. They have done this more than once. I am fond of Hsin-yi and very glad she married my godfather, but: this is insane. This is not the behavior of a stable person. Oh, did I mention that after they went by coach there, they had to come by coach back again? This seems relevant somehow. Coach tour from Los Angeles to Mount Rushmore, uff da, death first.
( and nine more )