Page Summary
raecarson.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nihilistic-kid.livejournal.com - (no subject)
angeyja.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dsgood.livejournal.com - (no subject)
merriehaskell.livejournal.com - (no subject)
madwriter.livejournal.com - (no subject)
matociquala.livejournal.com - (no subject)
stillsostrange.livejournal.com - (no subject)
blzblack.livejournal.com - (no subject)
athenais.livejournal.com - (no subject)
gwynnega - (no subject)
alecaustin.livejournal.com - (no subject)
buymeaclue.livejournal.com - (no subject)
truepenny.livejournal.com - (no subject)
stillnotbored.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dendrophilous.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ellarien - (no subject)
songwind.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cadithial.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dd-b.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kythiaranos.livejournal.com - (no subject)
astromachy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
oracne.livejournal.com - (no subject)
desayunoencama.livejournal.com - (no subject)
markiv1111.livejournal.com - Yes, yes, good news, good news!
Active Entries
- 1: Books read, late January
- 2: The Subtle Art of Folding Space, by John Chu
- 3: Books read, early January
- 4: Books read, late December
- 5: 2025 short stuff rec list
- 6: Books read, early December
- 7: Platform Decay, by Martha Wells
- 8: Exactly what we needed
- 9: 2025 in writing (my stuff)
- 10: Books read, late November
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 10:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 10:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 10:59 pm (UTC)Proesegranates?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 11:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 11:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 11:11 pm (UTC)pomegranates.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 11:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 11:45 pm (UTC)Any read on what about the story attracted them? I doubt I'll have any stories in a condition to submit any time soon, but like
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 01:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 12:08 am (UTC)::confetti::
Mmm. Pomegranate.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 01:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 01:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 03:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 05:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 11:12 am (UTC)Also, I did not submit through their forum but through the slush pile. Most other pro markets consider it publishing to have a story printed somewhere on a website (in my opinion, rightly so), and while I am very glad to be published by this market, I'm not glad enough to throw away any chance of being published anywhere else.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 06:26 am (UTC)I wanted to check what was known about the market you sold to, and I can't find any mention of it on the Baen web site. I guess it has its own site, but there really should be some sort of link! Huh, I found the actual title on boing boing, but no mention of it on Baen's site, and it doesn't seem to have its own yet. Seems a strange oversight; Locus has an article too, so why no news item on the Baen site?
Hope it works out. Eric actually seems mostly sensible. I think he and Jim have a bit of an over-reaction to "new wave" stories; I think the PJF answer is the right one really. But I'm firmly in the "style should serve the story" camp myself, as are all right-thinking people.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 11:14 am (UTC)I like some New Wave stuff, too (here is where I do my Delany dance), but yah, for me style is an aspect of how one is handling a story, not a reason for N thousand words all by itself.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 12:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 06:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-21 09:05 pm (UTC)Yay!
:-)
Yes, yes, good news, good news!
Date: 2005-11-21 11:35 pm (UTC)Nate B.
Re: Yes, yes, good news, good news!
Date: 2005-11-22 03:46 am (UTC)