State of the Mrissa Report: after the EEG
Jan. 18th, 2006 11:27 amSo. My brain is normal. Stop laughing! I have medical confirmation!
Okay, he did not actually say normal, he said within normal parameters. Still: no seizure disorder or other anomalous brain activity recorded in the sleep-deprived EEG.
This is a good thing.
We have a plan. This, too, is a good thing. The plan is:
1) Thorough work-up at competent dentist
2) Return to ENT for more in-depth test as discussed with Dr.
porphyrin, who is a Hero of the Revolution, a Flying Squirrel Diva of the Jovian Moons, and any other honor we can dig up around here.
3) See an additional, more specific neurological clinic that may be able to rule out more funkiness because of their greater experience with funkiness.
See what a plan it is? It is a plan. It does not involve me taking mind-altering medication for a condition I am not on record as having. And why does it not? Because I was polite but firm with the doctor and made him consider other options. Because I am well enough and of a personality type to stand up for myself. It bothers me that this was necessary, because not everybody is that well, and not everybody has that personality. I liked my first neurologist better. There's nothing wrong with this guy. I just liked the other one better. He (that is, the missed first neurologist) looked like
autopope (in hair mode, not bald mode) if
autopope had been Quebecois-Minnesotan. Also he listened to me and paid attention to what I said without me having to go into Marissa Lingen, Girl Physicist, geek smackdown mode. I can do ex-physicist smackdown mode. It's just wearing.
(Gosh. How many of my medical professionals can remind me of science fiction writers? My gp could be
matociquala's sister. This is not a bad thing, though.)
More specifics are available on e-mail for those of you who want to know things like "what kind of more specific neurological clinic?" But this is as much information as I care to give on lj for the moment.
I am -- as I have been the past several days -- rather tired, and I intend to spend much of the day doing stressful things like watching "Red Dwarf" and poking novels with veeeeeery long sticks and reading a Spenser novel borrowed from
dd_b.
Okay, he did not actually say normal, he said within normal parameters. Still: no seizure disorder or other anomalous brain activity recorded in the sleep-deprived EEG.
This is a good thing.
We have a plan. This, too, is a good thing. The plan is:
1) Thorough work-up at competent dentist
2) Return to ENT for more in-depth test as discussed with Dr.
3) See an additional, more specific neurological clinic that may be able to rule out more funkiness because of their greater experience with funkiness.
See what a plan it is? It is a plan. It does not involve me taking mind-altering medication for a condition I am not on record as having. And why does it not? Because I was polite but firm with the doctor and made him consider other options. Because I am well enough and of a personality type to stand up for myself. It bothers me that this was necessary, because not everybody is that well, and not everybody has that personality. I liked my first neurologist better. There's nothing wrong with this guy. I just liked the other one better. He (that is, the missed first neurologist) looked like
(Gosh. How many of my medical professionals can remind me of science fiction writers? My gp could be
More specifics are available on e-mail for those of you who want to know things like "what kind of more specific neurological clinic?" But this is as much information as I care to give on lj for the moment.
I am -- as I have been the past several days -- rather tired, and I intend to spend much of the day doing stressful things like watching "Red Dwarf" and poking novels with veeeeeery long sticks and reading a Spenser novel borrowed from
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 05:35 pm (UTC)I am glad that "within normal parameters" counts as a Good Thing: when, some years ago, I had that result from a diagnostic MRI, it translated as "yes, we can confirm your hypersensitivity to bright lights and the occasional stumbling, but the causes are too subtle for current medical technology, have a nice day."
More details by email would be welcome.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 05:40 pm (UTC)Congratulations on not having a seizure disorder, and on avoiding meds that treat conditions you don't have.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 05:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 05:46 pm (UTC)I particularly encourage step 0, the spending the rest of the day taking care of the
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 05:49 pm (UTC)"Got YOU, Chicken Marengo!"
the doctor thing
Date: 2006-01-18 05:53 pm (UTC)In my case it was a pacemaker - the doctor in case DID tell that probably I would not really need it , but as he had not attempeted to but a pacemaker into a younger (I had just turned 30 then)patient and at least I would not have to feel scared should my heart stop (even if it WOULD start up on its own anyway)...
Actually, as long as he did not want to add unnecessary machinery into my body, the man was quite fascinating and eager about his profession.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 05:57 pm (UTC)You just broke my imagination.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 08:17 pm (UTC)I've had a friend recently benefit from exactly this kind of empirical therapy. But it was for a condition that had many more of the hallmarks of the condition the drug is supposed to treat. I don't think she made the wrong choice for her, I just don't think it would have been the right choice for me. (Some of the reasons are in my reply to
Go, weirdly asymptomatic sinus infection! Woooo!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 06:31 pm (UTC)And huzzah! for having a Plan.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 06:51 pm (UTC)Although I wouldn't want to take Dilantin long-term unless I really needed it, it is not a particularly dangerous drug and the side effects are rarely serious. If you tried it for a month or two and the dysosmia immediately cleared up, that would tell you that it was probably a minor seizure disorder. You could then decide whether you wanted to continue with medication, find a different solution or live with the problem.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 08:11 pm (UTC)If my taste/smell disturbances were behaving at all like seizures, we might decide to get around all this. Might. But they aren't behaving like seizures in any way except that they're short on explanations for why I'm having them at all. So taking a medication that reproduces the major current problem (the fatigue) as a side effect -- plus has other side effects that more directly relate to concerns in my life and health -- just doesn't seem like a good idea right now. We may get to the point where we have more reason to try it, but we aren't at that point now.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 09:26 pm (UTC)Tiny localized seizures can cause disruption of any sense, which is why I guessed that the dysosmia was the symptom that made the doctor suggest medication. But if that's not the main problem and the side effects of the meds would aggravate the bigger problems, that would clearly be a silly thing to try. I don't blame you for getting annoyed that your neurologist didn't seem to be listening to you. Congratulations on making sure that he started.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 07:12 pm (UTC)I hope the plan is a successful plan.
In other news, it may amuse you to know that our frogs at work now have a raft. Our frogs at work _adore_ their raft.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 07:39 pm (UTC)(sorry; Red Dwarf + brain stuff = Zaphod reference)
Glad to hear you've eliminated another thing, and still have avenues for searching.
I'm curious how broad the 'normal parameters' are, it sounds like a rather suspect phrase to me. But then, I'm the suspicious type.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 07:46 pm (UTC)...because if
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 07:57 pm (UTC)as for M'ris's normality, there is no 'normal', just usual and unusual. M'ris is a very unusual person, and we lover her for/despite that.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 07:44 pm (UTC)I hope
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 07:59 pm (UTC)Was this from the same e-mail as the benzel bromides digression? Damn I wish I'd saved that one.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 08:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-19 03:04 am (UTC)See, people who know me well -- or even people who know me moderately, actually -- find it very hard to believe that anybody would make the mistake of treating me like I'm stupid. But some people initially look at me and see a cute little thing who shouldn't have to deal with big words. And then I have to quietly and firmly hand them their asses.
With many doctors, the phrase, "My degree work was in nuclear physics, so you can speak as though I have a brain" does the trick. They rear back, and then they start talking about things like the absolute levels of a hormone in the bloodstream versus the first derivative of that function.
One of the things I like best about my own doctor is that I never had to be snotty or sarcastic to get her to talk to me like I was not going to run screaming at the sound of chemical names.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-19 08:01 pm (UTC)Thin Young Woman + Tits = Speak Slowly
My math is also obvious there:
My Boot + Their Head = Good Idea
It's different with doctors who go in with no preconceptions about the patient's knowledge or intelligence; those people I understand and deal with as reasonable people. But I don't care to have people assume I'm stupid.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 11:48 pm (UTC)the oceanmy pulse in one ear, and further testing will be to assuage curiosity, not because it's treatable.on the other hand, now i feel unique because i have not one but twooo forms of tinnitus. go me!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-19 03:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-19 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-19 02:56 am (UTC)I do. Really.
I'm *awfully* glad you have a smackdown mode you can access, even if it is wearing. I'm usually good at it for myself, and especially good at it for others. (
Your reasons for not wanting to go on the med, especially not before doing other things (like your excellent plan) are cogent in the extreme. How annoying that your theoretically intelligent, indubitably educated care provider had to have them pointed out for him.
Here's hoping for a wacky, highly curable sinus infection. That sounds like a great diagnosis.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-19 10:23 am (UTC)