Murdered darlings and wedding advice
Aug. 31st, 2006 03:30 pmEdward's reaction to another character's death was a beautiful and affecting piece of writing, if I do say so myself. Unfortunately (well, not very unfortunately, from some perspectives), that character does not, in fact, die in this version of this book. Oops. So it's a darling that just plain has to be murdered.
Some people have talked about saving those bits, but I don't put them in a "cut bits" file. I just ax 'em. I can't figure what I would want it for. It's a dead end. It doesn't fit. It's not the shape of the story as I understand it now, and if the story shape was to change again, it wouldn't change back. Never once have I cut something from a story of any length and later thought, "Wait, I want that back." It's just not how my brain works, I guess. I can't see my way clear to how it would even work.
Have I mentioned that these characters are not the nicest people in the world? You'd be perfectly safe with them in a dark alley, but broad daylight, uff da.
Also, do you think it's okay to wear black to a wedding, in general? How about patterned stockings -- subtle patterns yes, fishnets no, or some other division of acceptable wedding wear? And boots: sometimes, never, occasionally but not generally, any time you feel like it, what? This is not a wedding wherein I am any kind of important person -- "groom's first kindergarten crush" doesn't usually get listed under "flower girl," so it's not like I'm setting the tone for anyone in particular beyond myself. But being around people from my more distant past makes me a little confused.
One of you asked how I decide what to post and what not to post. Elephino. I just...do, I guess. I've heard this asked about what one puts in a novel and what one doesn't, too, and the simple answer is that the things you put in a novel are the things that go there, and the things you don't put in a novel are the things that do not go there. Aren't you glad I was here to clear these things up?
Some people have talked about saving those bits, but I don't put them in a "cut bits" file. I just ax 'em. I can't figure what I would want it for. It's a dead end. It doesn't fit. It's not the shape of the story as I understand it now, and if the story shape was to change again, it wouldn't change back. Never once have I cut something from a story of any length and later thought, "Wait, I want that back." It's just not how my brain works, I guess. I can't see my way clear to how it would even work.
Have I mentioned that these characters are not the nicest people in the world? You'd be perfectly safe with them in a dark alley, but broad daylight, uff da.
Also, do you think it's okay to wear black to a wedding, in general? How about patterned stockings -- subtle patterns yes, fishnets no, or some other division of acceptable wedding wear? And boots: sometimes, never, occasionally but not generally, any time you feel like it, what? This is not a wedding wherein I am any kind of important person -- "groom's first kindergarten crush" doesn't usually get listed under "flower girl," so it's not like I'm setting the tone for anyone in particular beyond myself. But being around people from my more distant past makes me a little confused.
One of you asked how I decide what to post and what not to post. Elephino. I just...do, I guess. I've heard this asked about what one puts in a novel and what one doesn't, too, and the simple answer is that the things you put in a novel are the things that go there, and the things you don't put in a novel are the things that do not go there. Aren't you glad I was here to clear these things up?
Wedding
Date: 2006-08-31 08:39 pm (UTC)If you don't know, it is certainly acceptable to ask the bride.
B
Re: Wedding
Date: 2006-08-31 08:40 pm (UTC)Maybe I will ask the groom's mother.
Re: Wedding
Date: 2006-08-31 08:45 pm (UTC)B
Re: Wedding
Date: 2006-08-31 09:18 pm (UTC)Re: Wedding
From:Re: Wedding
From:Re: Wedding
From:no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 08:57 pm (UTC)The concept of asking the bride even if you don't know her makes some sense. And if you find out she's a complete flake in advance, you could even save a trip possibly.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 08:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 09:01 pm (UTC)But I have a rather cavalier attitude toward things labeled "You are supposed to/not supposed to because it's tradition" when I don't see a logical reason for it. Perhaps it's unkind of me, but I don't really care if I (unintentionally) offend someone I don't even know.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 09:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 09:27 pm (UTC)The patterned hose thing.. well, different people have different reactions to that. If the bride or her mother are part of the "fishnets are for hookers and strippers" crowd, I'd avoid them.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 10:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 10:54 pm (UTC)Yet another double standard.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 09:30 pm (UTC)do you think it's okay to wear black to a wedding, in general?
No, unless it's part of a pattern.
How about patterned stockings -- subtle patterns yes, fishnets no, or some other division of acceptable wedding wear?
What time will this wedding be? Patterns sound like very casual stockings, which would only be appropriate for an outdoor afternoon wedding. If that.
And boots:
No.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 09:32 pm (UTC)Anyway, I can't tell whether it's indoor or outdoor, but it's a late afternoon/early evening wedding, just exactly the wrong time for me to guess at formality level by timing.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 09:59 pm (UTC)Does that mean you're not allowed to meet us because we're creepy Livejournal folk?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 09:37 pm (UTC)I wore black to my best friend's wedding, but I was a maid of honour, and she told me and the bridesmaids to just go ahead and pick out a black dress we'd want to wear again to other occasions. She then proceeded to help me pick out a slinky backless dress which I now wear for the symphony.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 10:09 pm (UTC)That refers to all-black outfits, though. I don't see any problem with a black skirt and colored top or vice versa. I really don't see any trouble at all with patterned tights, with one big exception:
There's also a rule about not wearing white to a wedding, which is a subset of a bigger rule about not upstaging the bride. If when you ask about black and fishnets you're referring to the outfit you were photographed in at a recent con, with the short skirt, fishnets, and high boots, I would probably advise against it. In the picture I saw, you looked absolutely spectacular, and I think that outfit would definitely classify as upstaging everyone in the room.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 11:02 pm (UTC)I do have more subtly patterned stockings and longer skirts, though, so that was where the question was coming in.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 11:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 10:42 pm (UTC)I've not run into the "no black" rule ever before, but I think unless one is in the bridal party, one should wear whatever fits the formality of the occasion. I think asking a member of the wedding party and/or the bride if there's any specific dress code items might not hurt, though.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-01 11:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-01 01:06 pm (UTC)The last wedding I went to, I wore a nice Edwardian dress that faded from black at the hem to pastel green at the top with plain black tights and properly matched victorian side button boots. It was a nice little outfit. I thought it was classy and possibly even gothy without being wildly depressing or inappropriate.
But that's just me.
(no subject)
From: