mrissa: (question)
[personal profile] mrissa
[Poll #865706]

Elaboration in comments welcome.

Date: 2006-11-12 04:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lutin.livejournal.com
i promise an answer after i finish
reading esther's article & find the
site with cute fantasy/scifi element
names.

Elements

Date: 2006-11-12 06:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aet.livejournal.com
Refreshing poll. But hard to fill for the chemistry -challenged.

From the list you provided, I would have gone with Carbon for you, but some characteristics of Calcium felt more suitable from my point of view.

For myself I have to go with Chlorine (also, I love the cartoon that goes with Chlorine on WebElements site (http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Cl/key.html)).

Re: Elements

Date: 2006-11-12 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Like what with calcium?

Re: Elements

Date: 2006-11-12 02:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aet.livejournal.com
Being essential in both in living things and limestone. Existing in interaction and as firmly part of something ...

It may be, of course, that being part of stalagmites and stalactites as calcium carbonate was the image that charmed me and now I am just fibbing to get the other parts of image suitably right.

Re: Elements

Date: 2006-11-12 05:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Don't feel the need to fib! If you think calcium because of the stalagmites and calcium carbonate, that's enough.

Date: 2006-11-12 06:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madmanatw.livejournal.com
Holy cow, are there really that few fires?

Date: 2006-11-12 08:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] icedrake.livejournal.com
Now for some group psychoanalysis...

Date: 2006-11-12 01:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] papersky.livejournal.com
That was hard, but definitely the most interesting one of those I've done.

However, on the Chinese earth/air/fire/water/metal you would come out metal in my understanding.

Date: 2006-11-12 01:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Oh interesting! Particularly because you didn't pick iron or "Other" and then some metal for the chemical elements. I'm not like specific metal, I'm like elementally metal?

I thought of including metal or the other fifth elements I've seen (wood and spirit), but then I didn't.

Not at all surprised at your water, though I can't quite say why.

Date: 2006-11-12 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] papersky.livejournal.com
You are worked metal, the element of earth run through with air, annealed in fire and quenched in water. Steel, not cold iron.

Date: 2006-11-12 05:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Oh.

Wow.

Oh.

Date: 2006-11-12 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] intrepida.livejournal.com
I've never been clear on weather I was an "earth" or a "water" person. I think as I get older and become more "solid" in character, I'm becoming "earthier." As for the scientific elements, I'd choose Cadmium for myself, based on the name associating with "Cadmium red" paint and "Cadbury" chocolate. For you, I'd go with Curium, for its "women and science" association. (Ignoring that whole radioactivity issue.)

Date: 2006-11-12 05:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Yes, so far one of the consistent things is that I appear to be perceived as much more radioactive than the rest of you.

Which is fine.

Date: 2006-11-12 02:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] writingortyping.livejournal.com
I would have said "story" instead of "plot" for you, because I associate stories with things that unfold organically and plots as engineered things (a la TNH's statement re: story being a force of nature), and stories seem to happen to you (or maybe that's just my poor perception of the way you experience it via your description and I shall stop expressing myself in run-on parentheticals now, thankyouverymuch).

Date: 2006-11-12 06:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
I deliberately didn't include some things like "relationship," which is what I actually write "from."

Date: 2006-11-13 03:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottjames.livejournal.com
I checked "characters" because that was the closest to "characters' relationships" on the list.

Date: 2006-11-12 03:45 pm (UTC)
sraun: portrait (Default)
From: [personal profile] sraun
Which element?

me - Silicon
you - Rhenium

Date: 2006-11-12 06:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
I didn't realize I'd been that dense....

Date: 2006-11-12 07:26 pm (UTC)
sraun: portrait (Default)
From: [personal profile] sraun
Nah, that weird (in a good way). I've had a soft spot for Rhenium ever since read E.E. "Doc" Smith's Subspace Explorers.

Date: 2006-11-12 08:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Oh. Err. Well, good then.

Date: 2006-11-12 03:47 pm (UTC)
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
From: [personal profile] redbird
My first pair of answers are almost entirely arbitrary. I like the second set of questions. For the third, I settled immediately on "carbon-based life form" and that's everyone reading this, as far as I know. (Any hooloovoos out there?)

Date: 2006-11-13 12:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] timprov.livejournal.com
Sometimes I can do a convincing Horta.

Date: 2006-11-12 04:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] diatryma.livejournal.com
This was a really interesting poll. I don't know you well enough to put down a chemical element, though as above, you might be carbonate ions as a whole (baking powder, baking soda, rocks rocks rocks). I've had a thing for iron for a good few years now-- not the element itself, but its spot on the periodic table. Fe is such a comforting symbol.

Date: 2006-11-12 05:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] diatryma.livejournal.com
Wait, iron was on there? It's been too long staring at chemistry if I can't recognize it without the Fe.

Date: 2006-11-12 06:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
It will break your brain, to be sure.

Date: 2006-11-12 06:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] diatryma.livejournal.com
Part of it's that iron and Fe are two different things in my brain. Iron is industry, the death of faeries, wrought into railings, and fireplace pokers. Fe is language, fey, pleasant associations of iron, and staring at the periodic table until I got character names out of it (though I haven't sold my Geasse story, I do love her name).
And I don't think I'm particularly ironlike in either sense.

Date: 2006-11-12 07:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spaceoperadiva.livejournal.com
I have always fancied Mercury but not in a "oh look, I can poison people!" way, more in a flexible and useful kind of way. I probably am poisonous in large quantities though.

Date: 2006-11-12 08:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Have you read Stephenson's Quicksilver?

Date: 2006-11-13 06:57 am (UTC)
brooksmoses: (Default)
From: [personal profile] brooksmoses
A while back, I was reading a 1911 Scientific American Cyclopedia of Recipes, and came across the mercury section -- which included several different varieties of "mix mercury and powder of some other metal, knead between your fingers until it makes a soft paste, use it to stick other bits of metal together, and then use some sort of gentle heat to evaporate out the mercury."

I had this sudden feeling of having been terribly cheated, that such things could exist and have been part of basic workshop technology a century ago, and yet turn out to be be far too poisonous to consider actually using now that we know.

Date: 2006-11-13 06:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spaceoperadiva.livejournal.com
My dad, who was a very much older sort of dad, was born in 1896. He told me that one of the ways that small-time gold hunters would separate mercury from gold was to stick the mercury tainted gold into a potato and bake it and hope that the oven didn't blow up in the process. I'm always in a state of awe and horror over those old processes. So clever and simple, and yet sometimes dangerous beyond belief.

Date: 2006-11-13 12:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] avrelia.livejournal.com
Out of the chemichal elements, I would associalte myself with Cobalt. For no good reason, really.

Date: 2006-11-13 12:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
While logical reasons are sometimes interesting, they're certainly not required in this kind of poll.

Date: 2006-11-13 12:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greykev.livejournal.com
I picked argon for the way you shine when energized.

Date: 2006-11-13 02:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Aww, thanks, Kev.

Date: 2006-11-13 03:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottjames.livejournal.com
I picked "iron" for you, because of your issues with maintaining iron.

And "water" for you, because it flows and adapts to its surroundings but is not compressible (not as a liquid, mostly, anyway--hey, I'm an engineer). Because being compressible seems like a bad character trait.

Yeah, I know. I don't quite get it, either.

Date: 2006-11-13 06:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
I could maybe be a bit more compressible than I am, though. Not a lot. Just a little.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
1112131415 1617
18192021222324
252627 28293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 29th, 2026 04:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios