Whew, professions, influence.
May. 17th, 2007 05:27 pmI now seem to be getting all of my e-mail, or at least I don't know of mail I'm not getting. Whew.
We had a worry about my grandfather's health that now looks like it is a minor and fixable issue, so that's a larger source of Whew.
We are the proud owners of all the groceries. All of them. It's very easy to get to the point where you have more groceries than you have
mrissa when you fill the cart and the bottom of the cart and then also buy two 40-pound bags of water softener salt. Sometimes my grocery shopping sort of runs away with me -- I mean to be getting a lot of things to feed to specific people on specific occasions, and while I'm in that aisle to get one thing I see two more things we know we'll want to have in the pantry, and one thing we might want to try, and...it snowballs. Rapidly. Oof.
Ista does not approve of me being gone to get my back fixed and go to the pharmacy and take things to the battery/electronics recycling center and get groceries, so she is now draped over my lap, sighing impatiently when I wiggle too much.
I got an interesting rejection today: the editors -- who are thoughtful editors, editors I like -- felt that the story had switched from SF to fantasy halfway through a rather short story. I didn't think that the story was ever SF, so I was wondering: would you assume that a story set at a scientific research station was SF? Would you find it confusing to have a story with scientist characters turn out to be fantasy? What about programmer characters? Engineer characters?
I'm thinking about the perpetual complaint that I have about Charles de Lint's work and a few others, where everybody is some kind of artist in their fantasy novels. I'm wondering if this is partly because other professions are signaling other genres to people. That would frustrate me immensely, but it'd be good to know if it's actually going on.
And one more thing: I am, as many of you are, sad to hear of the death of Lloyd Alexander. The Kestrel is one of my favorite books in the world, and one of the books most important to what I'm doing now. I loved the Prydain books and the Vesper Holly adventures, but the Westmark trilogy, particularly The Kestrel, hit notes in my heart that nothing else has ever quite found. I'm glad that, from all reports I've heard, Lloyd Alexander had a good death in his old age -- but I was still hoping against hope that there might be one more word from Westmark someday, and now there never will be. Earlier today I asked about musicians and authors who felt like they'd always been a part of your life, and Lloyd Alexander is and will always remain one of those for me.
We had a worry about my grandfather's health that now looks like it is a minor and fixable issue, so that's a larger source of Whew.
We are the proud owners of all the groceries. All of them. It's very easy to get to the point where you have more groceries than you have
Ista does not approve of me being gone to get my back fixed and go to the pharmacy and take things to the battery/electronics recycling center and get groceries, so she is now draped over my lap, sighing impatiently when I wiggle too much.
I got an interesting rejection today: the editors -- who are thoughtful editors, editors I like -- felt that the story had switched from SF to fantasy halfway through a rather short story. I didn't think that the story was ever SF, so I was wondering: would you assume that a story set at a scientific research station was SF? Would you find it confusing to have a story with scientist characters turn out to be fantasy? What about programmer characters? Engineer characters?
I'm thinking about the perpetual complaint that I have about Charles de Lint's work and a few others, where everybody is some kind of artist in their fantasy novels. I'm wondering if this is partly because other professions are signaling other genres to people. That would frustrate me immensely, but it'd be good to know if it's actually going on.
And one more thing: I am, as many of you are, sad to hear of the death of Lloyd Alexander. The Kestrel is one of my favorite books in the world, and one of the books most important to what I'm doing now. I loved the Prydain books and the Vesper Holly adventures, but the Westmark trilogy, particularly The Kestrel, hit notes in my heart that nothing else has ever quite found. I'm glad that, from all reports I've heard, Lloyd Alexander had a good death in his old age -- but I was still hoping against hope that there might be one more word from Westmark someday, and now there never will be. Earlier today I asked about musicians and authors who felt like they'd always been a part of your life, and Lloyd Alexander is and will always remain one of those for me.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 10:45 pm (UTC)As for your story question--I think it might be confusing, to have a story set on a scientific research station turn out to be a fantasy (at least if it was a very short story, where there wasn't a lot of time to set up auxilliary weirdness, if that makes sense). I mean, as an editor and reader I'd love to see more stories that challenge the standard fantasy settings and character types, so the idea of scientists in a fantasy works on that level. But I can see where it might be disconcerting. (It's hard to judge, not having read the story. But I'd be willing to take a look and give my opinion if you like.)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 10:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 11:00 pm (UTC)I hear you on the de Lint thing, and it irritates me a little, but it also shapes my expectations; if a story starts off with an artist, I'm more likely to think it's fantasy than SF. I think part of it is that, if a character's profession is brought up in a story, I expect it to be relevant, and SF that is out there tends to have little to do with artists, and the fantasy that is out there has little to do with scientists.
Mind you, I have a novel-to-write that's an urban fantasy with a geneticist for the main character, so clearly this is not always true. But often enough for my brain to react in certain ways until told to do otherwise.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 02:23 am (UTC)There are stories of mine (and will be more in the future) that are both SF and fantasy -- that is, that feature speculative science as well as magic. But this isn't one of them. It's a present-day Arctic research station setting for a fantasy novel.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 06:46 am (UTC)I was thinking that _Cowboy Feng_ has artists in it, and is sf, and I just waited for the story to tell me what flavor it was. But I'm not sure that I waited. I was galloping through the story because I wanted to know what would happen next.
I just read a story in _The Green Man_ anthology. I don't know how to describe it. It was fantasy in the way that poetry is fantasy. I though it would be grim and it was not, although it was about oppression. (The title had paint in it - painting or paint the sky.) Yet it felt a bit like the way Ray Bradbury sometimes writes.
It also felt like a fairy tale. But Tepper's _Beauty_ is a fairy tale, and it never felt like fantasy.
I would wait for the story to give me a mood rather than a setting or a character to define it, I think.
- Chica
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 05:15 am (UTC)But I am a snarkypants, scarred by slush. :p
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 10:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 10:59 pm (UTC)There are plenty of fantasies involving characters with technical jobs.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 11:15 pm (UTC)I would initially assume it was SF if there was no apparent fantasy, but this ties into a different question, how you code for non-realistic whatever-it-is in the first place. Is your research station doing not-currently-real science? Like--I read it first as "research space station" and that certainly would look like SF to me. But some Darkover novels have magic science and that's clearly shown to be magic. (Of course, that series kind of does switch from SF to F partway through but I tend to think that's a plus.)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 11:25 pm (UTC)Stories containing both spaceships and magic often get classified as science fiction these days; they used to be called "science fantasy". (Unless the magic was called psi.)
Trends in characters, settings
Date: 2007-05-17 11:48 pm (UTC)I've had stretches where it seemed like there were a lot of student environments, maybe because of that being a transtional space, or because of the coming of age story. Maybe just coincidences of publishing like when years when there's several books dealing that ref Beauty and the Beast.
In terms of setting, no it wouldn't signal SF to me. But, there's times where science and magic were more close than now? I like the idea of a science setting. And sort of following that thought a little, it seems to fit well with other reading or trends I had been noticing the last few years. Rather than have to segment things, drawing together, like some of the cross discipline programs, or studying soemthing like flow state.
That's as a general. Further, I think you'd have to see the story itself?
Glad to hear about your whews. Ben showed up tonight just as Cole and I came home from a walk. Done with freshman year. Whew! and whoot!
Re: Trends in characters, settings
Date: 2007-05-18 02:18 am (UTC)And whoot for Ben indeed!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 12:30 am (UTC)I wonder whether he intended that.
I also wonder whether anyone is doing that for the current generation of kids. I don't know enough about YA to say. I hope someone is, though. It was an absolutely essential experience.
(And of course it's not the same, but yuletidetreasure.org has the only Lloyd Alexander fanfic I've ever found, including a brief Prydain story by yours truly.)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 02:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 02:25 am (UTC)In some LJ discussion--perhaps chez
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 02:39 am (UTC)Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 06:52 am (UTC)Not to disparage any of you nice people reading this - but I don't know that you want me to go on and on.
And, for that matter, I hope they look back on a certain writer who combines hockey sticks and fairies. Because that's a book I want on my shelf some day!
- Chica
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 12:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 02:34 am (UTC)Well, 'member the time that I referred to Thermionic Night as science fiction? Just because there were vacuum tubes?
Some of us are not always Too Swift On the Uptake. I don't think that means you should cater to Us, though.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 03:10 am (UTC)Hmm, professions that my protagonists have undertaken; aristocratic warrior/government, programmer, games designer, psychiatric counsellor of the sort who sees it as like debugging only with humans, readjustment counsellor for people awakening from long-term cryosleep, confusing figurehead position in government of society run by complete loons, explorer of alien star systems, directionless dilettante [ rather a lot of those ], burger flipper in a McAbomination, manning the desk at a bureau de change in a major railway station - both those last as time-filling ways of keeping a roof over their heads while they either do something a lot more important or are directionless dilettantes about exactly what a lot more important is worth doing respectively, research wizard, supervisor of official angelic/demonic presence on Earth, Lord Captain of His Draconic Majesty's Musketeers. I think that's a reasonable spread.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 03:15 am (UTC)If you've got a character in a clearly technical situation, you either need to signal very early (and pretty strongly) that it's fantasy, or else plan for people to be jolted when it becomes apparent later, IMAO. Either could work out just fine.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 04:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 03:57 pm (UTC)It's strange that the failure is to bounce immediately; that means the connection is being made, and the mail receiver is rejecting the email.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 04:44 am (UTC)Well, unless you have forgotten you already know my answer. And answer most Russians would give - after all, "Monday begins on Saturday" by Arkadi and Boris Strugatsky (English translation available online here (http://www.russiansifiction.com/translated/strugazckie/monday/index.php) ), has both a research institute filled with researchers and program engineers and full set of Russian folktale characters like fire-breathing dragons and house on hen's legs ...
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 11:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 12:26 pm (UTC)OK, this drove me into corner.
As, from one side, may-be when those people KNOW they shouldn't, they will feel too ashamed of having such a rigid mind to tell you.
But, from other side, if they are the ones that are supposed to buy your stories AND now they still do not buy, but are also too ashamed to tell WHY they feel uncomfortable, that may mean a loss of further postal fees for you.
Also, as long as they are not ashamed to own up that they just cannot see science and magic in same story, it is possible to educate those buyers, so that they will at least know that many readers have less rigid minds and/or LIKE to be surprised by unexpected turns a story takes.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 12:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 12:41 pm (UTC)You mean you used MAGIC?! There was a SPELL included in your entry!
I should have known if Marissa contains science + fiction, there is also magic to be expected!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 12:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 12:26 pm (UTC)Re: Science fiction turning into fantasy. I have a short story that is set in a research laboratory.....but which is definitely fantasy, because the ENTIRE laboratory happens to exist in one of the fantasy phaseworlds that open onto other worlds. The establishment of the fantasy aspect comes about two paragraphs in though.
I do think that the genre is currently very tolerant of science fiction disguised as fantasy (re: Anne McCaffrey's dragons, or Dave Duncan's The Coming of Wisdom--both start off with fantasy elements but it is later discovered that the things that look magical are brought about through technologies) but perhaps less open to things that look like they are flowing the opposite direction. When I was younger, I got the impression that the science fiction folk looked down upon fantasy a little--that it was softer, fuzzier, not rooted as much in logic, and while that impression has waned over time, I have to wonder if there is still some prejudice against fantasy with science fiction trappings.
We love to quote Clarke's law about how "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic," but I think that you should be allowed to play with the idea that the magic is the technology. That alchemy and performable magics have been studied and refined over the years, and that there is a scientific method ruling them as well. I like stories that buck against the "everything has been the same for thousands of years" cliche. I like the idea of magicians in lab coats, titrating chemicals, and writing research papers. It's no odder than magic being performed through music (the most common cliche).
I do note that Robin Hobb's latest book has her main character studying engineering, although, alas, it does not factor into his magical talents as much.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 02:22 pm (UTC)I've been saying this for long enough that I finally got fed up and started writing it myself, because while I have seen magic-as-industrial-technology done rather well [ notably WJW's Metropolitan and City on Fire ] there's really not anything out there that does magic-as-science that captures the genuine excitement of being on the cutting edge of scientific research; what I am hoping to capture is magic going through paradigm shifts on a scale comparable to those science has gone through in the twentieth century.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 03:23 pm (UTC)What I would like to do, is follow a society as both magic and technology evolve.....have one story set in sort of a magical Renaissance, then another later in a sort of Industrial revolution, and then another advancing even further. It seems to me that even when people approach magic-as-technology, they tend to stay within a certain established time period for the entirety of the exploration.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 12:40 pm (UTC)(I hope "Stick with me, kid," is parsing as a whole phrase and not as me attempting to call you kid separately.)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 09:58 pm (UTC): I have that same complaint about CDL. Artists and musicians, though I expect you were grouping them together. I don't get the feeling he uses artists to signal fantasy so much as to signal intelligent person who is open to the magic around them. There also feels like some of the superiority you mentioned in a reply to
Professionally, I work in network security and also am a semi-professional musician. (Well... piper, actually, and there are those who don't include pipers in the class of musician. :) Having played at music festivals and renfaires, and taught at arts and music camps, I've gotten to know a good number of musicians and artists. From my experience, you can't make a generalization that musicians and artists are more likely to believe in magic than non-musicians and non-artists. There are certainly those who might see it; there are certainly those who'd think you are full of crap if you mentioned it. The same goes for techies.
CDL's use of artists was reasonable a time or two. More than that and it ends up being a convenient short-hand that is as useful as most other stereotypes.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 11:52 am (UTC)