Rapid cultural change in a nutshell.
May. 5th, 2008 10:08 pmWhen Donnie Darko* was set, in 1988, four teenagers jumping on their bikes to go across town in the evening was a reasonable thing.
When Donnie Darko was made, in 2001, it was an historical reference.
Wow.
*Which I watched for the first time tonight.
When Donnie Darko was made, in 2001, it was an historical reference.
Wow.
*Which I watched for the first time tonight.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 05:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 02:26 pm (UTC)(Small = fewer than 1400 people. Very small = fewer than 500 people. Those were my metrics, anyway.)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 06:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 11:50 am (UTC)Even in broad daylight, several teenagers riding their bikes together is really unusual; if you throw out the cases where they're riding a trail as a form of exercise/entertainment and consider the ones where they are riding somewhere together as transportation, it's nearly nonexistent.
I'm on the near end of this cultural change, too: I think 1988 was about the end of it, because when I started high school in the fall of 1992, of course none of my agemate friends were old enough to drive, but we never got on our bikes and rode anywhere together. No one we knew would have considered it.
I think it was partly that as younger kids we were more restricted in the use of bikes. We couldn't just hop on our bikes and go where we wanted. It wasn't considered safe any more. When I was in junior high, I could ride over to a friend's house in the same neighborhood, but if I had announced that I was going to ride a couple of neighborhoods away, either I would have been told that that wasn't a good idea, or I had the impression that I would. So as teenagers, people didn't have a habit of riding bikes together to get somewhere from their earlier years. (I also suspect that if I had announced at 14 or 15, "I'm going to take my bike down to the Park 4 with Mandy; we'll be back after the movie [after dark]," I'd have still gotten an oh-no-you're-not from the parentals. And the Park 4 was a mile, mile and a half from their house with only midsize roads between. And if I hadn't gotten the parental negative, Mandy certainly would have.)
The other part, I think, is that when a lot of people reached high school, they became embarrassed about not being able to drive (or, horrors! being old enough to drive, being licensed to drive, and not having a car). I didn't get it at the time. The first day of school, the seniors would bring signs to the pep rally that said things like, "Hey freshmen! My mom can drive us there if your mom can pick us up!" Which infuriated some of my classmates and left me completely confused: I would not have been proud of being a high school freshman at 16 or 17, so why, exactly, was this an insult? But it was. Having a car had become not just a status symbol but an expected one (the richer kids had nicer ones sooner, but most people had them; I didn't, but most of my friends did). And mine was not a rich high school.
I think the latter factor was partly caused by the former: people began thinking of their kids walking or biking somewhere as unsafe, so they did more to make sure there was a car available sometimes even if the kid didn't have a car all the time. If you're not going to let your kid walk two miles home from tennis practice, it's far easier to make sure she has a car when she's old enough than to keep driving her back and forth.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 12:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 12:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 12:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 02:07 pm (UTC)people began thinking of their kids walking or biking somewhere as unsafe, so they did more to make sure there was a car available sometimes even if the kid didn't have a car all the time.
I like this argument, because it's more dangerous to for a kid to drive a car than it is for a kid to bike home at 2AM.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 05:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 11:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 06:37 am (UTC)So what changed between 1988 and 2001? In bike-riding land, I mean. As far as I know, present-day New York teens take the subway across town in the evening, just like they did in 1988.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 06:50 am (UTC)My guess is Penn students in that area still ride their bikes at night, but that 14-year-olds in the same neighborhood *don't*.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 11:53 am (UTC)But yes, people who didn't have subways had to do other things. See my response to Elise for the rest.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 04:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 12:26 pm (UTC)Kids miss out on a lot these days, I think.
And I heart Donnie Darko, especially references to it, which allows me to break out the icon, lol.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 12:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 12:49 pm (UTC)Not often, though.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 02:07 pm (UTC)teens on bikes
Date: 2008-05-06 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 04:37 pm (UTC)High school was pretty much the same way--and being from a car culture where almost everyone I knew had a car for their 16th or 17th birthday (some old, some new, some just handed down keys for when the 'rents didn't need it), few people walked or biked to school.
But this was after the whole Adam Walsh kidnapping and murder, and during the rise of "America's Most Wanted." There was the feeling of a pedophile around every corner. No way were kids/teens allowed to roam the streets unsupervised. The mall was where we all ended up. Yes. The Mall. Why that was safer than being outside, I'll never know.
Where I live now, there are lots of bikers. I live in suburbia and our town has bike lanes and places for bikers to lock their bikes up. The buses will load up the bikes so a rider can bike partway and bus the rest (or for our area, bus across the lakes and ride in the city). It's very bike friendly (but hilly terrrain).
I don't see groups of teens anywhere. But then, I tend to avoid the mall and cheap eateries, so I have no idea how our area teens congregate. We are not a pedestrian area although the city tries to make it so. But it just isn't.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 06:04 pm (UTC)All the people I knew in Pittsburgh that rode bikes were bike messengers with mountain bikes and they were ALL INSANE. I couldn't afford a mountain bike AND a car (I got the car for $350... the mountain bike would have cost me $500...) so I opted for transportation that could get me to Detroit in the snow, if that's where whimsy lead me...
Now I live in Madison, and I see people pedaling diligently everywhere... But not gangs of teenagers. We have tons of college students, and many of them ride bikes due to fuel prices or just to save the environment... But none of those people seem to go anywhere in *groups*....
How odd.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 07:06 pm (UTC)But when I grew up in a major Ohio city in the nineties, I had a bike and I used it for transportation of me, but it would literally never have occurred to me that it could be a form of group transport. It never crossed my mind until you mentioned it. Despite the fact that now that I think of it my friends had bikes. My father and I used to bike places together, so I think it must have been a teenage-cultural blind spot.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-06 11:34 pm (UTC)