mrissa: (reading)
[personal profile] mrissa
1. Fantasy did not actually need to be structured more like basketball. No, really not.

2. If you'd published your fanfic online like everybody else, I would not have had to read an entire chapter to determine that your Mary Sue was stupid and obvious, because I would never have gotten there.

3. It is entirely possible that people who are unpleasant to their romantic/sexual partners are interesting in other ways, but when you don't show me any of their traits but being unpleasant to their romantic/sexual partners, it makes it hard for me to summon up any damn to give.

4. Do you know why we sometimes write dialog instead of paraphrasing it every single time? Go away and find out before you write another book.

5. I know that it is not unrealistic to write a completely self-absorbed character, particularly one without much life experience. But that doesn't make them any more fun to read about, particularly when you, the author, don't seem to realize that this is not how everybody is. When your protag moans that they have no friends and I think, "Give me $5 and I will tell you why," this is not the road to a long and happy reading experience.

6. You know what's worse than writing alternating viewpoints where I only care about one of the viewpoints? Writing alternating viewpoints where I don't care about any of the viewpoints.

7. Biography is an art form. It is an art form that does not require the writing of twee, precocious dialog to put words in your famous subject's 10-year-old mouth.

8. Have you met any actual New York street toughs like the ones in your book? No? This "write what you know" thing: it is not perfect advice. Its limitations are rather severe. But "write what does not make you look like a complete idiot" is a good place to start.

9. It is your prerogative to hate people like me and think we are all awful. It is my prerogative not to read about it. Neat how that works, huh?

10. It turns out I don't really care what Famous Historical Personage #1 wrote to Famous Historical Personage #2 about the food at a party they both attended and I didn't. I thought perhaps my dislike of collections of letters was something I had outgrown. Nope.

11. This is a personal idiosyncratic thing as well: I am a really, really tough sell for books about tiny people. I don't mean human beings of medically abnormal stature. I mean people 3-12 inches tall. As fantasy conceits go, I can't think why this one is such a loser for me, but it really is.

12. If you are going to write an historical novel for teens, the fact that it is historical fantasy does not excuse you from doing your research. (Do I even need to say that the fact that it is for teens does not? I had better not need to say that.) And if you got the street names right and the basic gender roles and limitations of the period very wrong, you did not do your research. It's not just the bits you think are important about the period. It's the bits they thought were important about the period.

Date: 2008-12-15 03:31 am (UTC)
guppiecat: (Default)
From: [personal profile] guppiecat
You're hanging out in the wrong alternate world Manhattan. You need to hang out in the poorly-written ones.

Though, interestingly, this touches on one of my pet peeves. Why does everything happen in New York or L.A.? Aren't there any stories in Boise? Like, any at ALL?

(Personally, I'd love to see a superhero series of heroes and villains that aren't powerful enough to make it in the big city, so we get to read about the second stringers.)

Date: 2008-12-15 03:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Hey, why does it have to be that they're not powerful enough? Maybe they just hate traffic and don't really care if there's only one airport in their metro as long as their neighbors are still willing to meet their eyes when they pass them on the street.

Date: 2008-12-15 03:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
(Since I've sold three short stories set in Bemidji and am working on another and a novel, I think I get credit on this one.)

Boise

Date: 2008-12-15 04:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madwriter.livejournal.com
Well, there are stories set there, if you don't mind the fact that they usually take place after the Apocalypse. The one springing to mind first is in S.M. Stirling's second Change series, where Boise as a city survived the end of technology (literally--it stops running, ala the book Ariel, which unfortunately does take place in New York City) and the "president" is trying to rebuild the United States (though only controls a little bit of Idaho).

Date: 2008-12-15 06:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rushthatspeaks.livejournal.com
You want this (http://www.amazon.com/G-L-Vol-Misassembled-Great-Avengers/dp/0785116214/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1229320798&sr=8-1), then. Funnier than it should be, even.

Date: 2008-12-15 05:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hypatia-j.livejournal.com
That's the first thing I thought of too.

Date: 2008-12-15 09:32 pm (UTC)
guppiecat: (Default)
From: [personal profile] guppiecat
Oh dear. This is Damage Control for the modern era, isn't it?

On my order list.

Date: 2008-12-15 07:57 am (UTC)
ext_24729: illustration of a sitting robed figure in profile (eyes closed)
From: [identity profile] seabream.livejournal.com
Have you seen Playing For Keeps (http://www.playingforkeepsnovel.com/), by podcaster Mur Lafferty? It's still available as a free DRM-free PDF if you want to take a look at it.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 234567
8 91011121314
15161718 192021
22232425 262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 12:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios