Open Letter, Number Thirty Million Or So
Oct. 3rd, 2004 01:03 pmDear Hosiery Company:
Please examine your sizing chart. You will notice that "small" goes up to 5'5". This is well and good: women shorter than I am should be able to buy tights. You will also notice that "medium" goes down to 135#. This is also well and good: women heavier than I am should also be able to buy tights. Here's my theory, though: I should be able to buy tights.
Could you not manufacture tights in additional combinations of height and weight? Or could you not build that much more stretch into your smalls so that they will go up not-proportionally-that-long 5'6" woman legs, rather than being the ever-popular low-rise tights and causing me to worry that they will slip over the widest part of my hips and make a break for it at any moment? One's tights ought never to make a break for it. This is a rule of life. Nor ought they to be baggy upon their removal from the package. The ever popular wrinkled-elephant ankle is not "in" for this season.
I just thought you should know. I don't really expect that you'll do anything about it.
Yours Wearing SmartWool Socks,
M'ris
Please examine your sizing chart. You will notice that "small" goes up to 5'5". This is well and good: women shorter than I am should be able to buy tights. You will also notice that "medium" goes down to 135#. This is also well and good: women heavier than I am should also be able to buy tights. Here's my theory, though: I should be able to buy tights.
Could you not manufacture tights in additional combinations of height and weight? Or could you not build that much more stretch into your smalls so that they will go up not-proportionally-that-long 5'6" woman legs, rather than being the ever-popular low-rise tights and causing me to worry that they will slip over the widest part of my hips and make a break for it at any moment? One's tights ought never to make a break for it. This is a rule of life. Nor ought they to be baggy upon their removal from the package. The ever popular wrinkled-elephant ankle is not "in" for this season.
I just thought you should know. I don't really expect that you'll do anything about it.
Yours Wearing SmartWool Socks,
M'ris
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 12:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 03:17 pm (UTC)Also, these things are generally more comfy if bought a size larger.
Extra also: good department stores might carry what you want. More expensive, but you'll get more than one season out of tights if you are careful with them. Handwash, I keep saying for good reason. Or at least get a lingerie bag.
K.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 03:28 pm (UTC)I've been sticking the ones that work in a lingerie bag and getting good season-spanning luck, but one size up for me is immediately baggy without even having to throw it in the wash without a lingerie bag.
By the way, I looked at Nordstrom's at the bras because of your recommendation. They do indeed have many sizes and some pretty options. Most of the ones in my size were in the $70+ range, but if I ever have a bra emergency that's worth $70, I'll know where to go.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 03:42 pm (UTC)I think that well fitting lingerie is worth investing in, and have always bought the best bras I could possibly afford. Since they'll last several years, I justified an expensive initial outlay by considering the cost on a per-day basis. YMMV.
K.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 04:10 pm (UTC)One small will be too short for me, and the other supposedly identical pair I bought at the same time will be fine. One medium will be immediately baggy when I put it on, and the other supposedly identical pair will be fine. And it's not even that my size/shape is varying a lot from day to day -- this can be on the very same day, within a 5-10 minute interval. Of course, I've had some very strange hosiery experiences (one leg 3" longer than the other coming out of the package). I don't know if I just have the Bad Hosiery Luck or what.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 05:10 pm (UTC)Oi.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 10:56 pm (UTC)*And* much of their clothing is expected to conform to those shapes more exactly than men's clothing is.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 11:05 pm (UTC)I understand that the size numbers have been changed several times.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-04 07:57 am (UTC)But men's clothing does this, too. There are men's stores where a 34" waist allows for 36" of waist, and there are probably men's stores where a 36" waist only allows for 34" of waist. They just lie about different things.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-04 10:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-04 08:01 am (UTC)Also, men who don't wear wetsuits do not have single garments that are supposed to fit them fairly exactly from shoulders to hips or knees or ankles. Not all women do, either, but dresses are a major fashion option for us, and most swimsuits are sold as a unit whether they're one piece or two.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 10:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-04 07:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-04 08:02 am (UTC)And pants, we hates them, precious. Pants do not make shopping easier.