Date: 2010-04-13 08:10 pm (UTC)
That is how I would read it, yes. And while I freely acknowledge that breaking the chain there is arbitrary, it at least functions like a well-constructed alternate history: you pick your one point of deviation, and extrapolate from there. No machines that run on electricity. Check. But you can still have gaslights and steam engines and gunpowder, without the unspoken assumption that there are light bulbs and telephones and so on just around the corner. I very much prefer that to individually deciding which technologies should be permitted into the setting and which shouldn't, on no particular principle other than "what does the author think is cool?" That's what I think of as "above the waterline" arbitrariness.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 14th, 2026 01:18 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios