Gender-swapping characters
Mar. 3rd, 2011 09:37 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So
timprov and I were having a bit of a sigh and a bit of an eye-roll about Ursula LeGuin's post on The Tempest, and we got to talking about gender-swapping characters. I firmly believe that any particular character can have that done, but not always without altering the story immensely--sometimes the entire setting has to be redone in order to make it work. And
timprov brought up Jean Valjean as an example of this: you can write a woman Valjean, but Jeanne Valjean needs a different setting completely to be able to do the things Jean did.
This brought him to suggest that Katee Sackhoff would make a truly awesome Javert, and I loved the idea: the girl born to prison life instead of the boy, the tough-as-nails young woman for whom the law is not mocked. (For those of you not keeping score, Katee Sackhoff was Starbuck on the new Battlestar Galactica.) I don't even know if she can sing. I don't even care. I just really like this idea. "Men like you can never change, a man...such as you...."
(I had a conversation that made me aware of some of my conversational assumptions this morning, and I'm now noticing that I feel the need to flag a popular actress but not the characters from Les Miserables. Oh, assumptions.)
Also: Dr. Spencer Reid of Criminal Minds is a very different person if she is Dr. Stephanie Reid, the team's little sister figure and the daughter of a mentally ill medievalist, and yet a lot of the Reid-peril stuff in early seasons plays out exactly the same.
Anyway. Anybody else have some ideas for what stories would shift interestingly if a character's sex was swapped, and which ones would actually look substantially similar?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
This brought him to suggest that Katee Sackhoff would make a truly awesome Javert, and I loved the idea: the girl born to prison life instead of the boy, the tough-as-nails young woman for whom the law is not mocked. (For those of you not keeping score, Katee Sackhoff was Starbuck on the new Battlestar Galactica.) I don't even know if she can sing. I don't even care. I just really like this idea. "Men like you can never change, a man...such as you...."
(I had a conversation that made me aware of some of my conversational assumptions this morning, and I'm now noticing that I feel the need to flag a popular actress but not the characters from Les Miserables. Oh, assumptions.)
Also: Dr. Spencer Reid of Criminal Minds is a very different person if she is Dr. Stephanie Reid, the team's little sister figure and the daughter of a mentally ill medievalist, and yet a lot of the Reid-peril stuff in early seasons plays out exactly the same.
Anyway. Anybody else have some ideas for what stories would shift interestingly if a character's sex was swapped, and which ones would actually look substantially similar?
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 03:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 03:48 am (UTC)And I a) like the idea of Katee Sackhoff as Javert, and b) grin at the choice of what to clarify and what to assume your audience knows. :-)
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 04:12 am (UTC)(Oddly, it would be easier to get away with a female Sherlock Holmes, which is of course what inspired House. I think because detectives aren't expected to be compassionate about people's suffering, the way doctors and women are, and House isn't.)
And then, of course, there's superheroes. The actual Batwoman is not the same as a female Batman. I'd love to see a properly gender-flipped Batman, or Superman, or any of the others -- hah, a female Wolverine would be awesome.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 06:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 12:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 12:48 pm (UTC)Which Bruce Wayne doesn't much seem to. Possibly because it doesn't require pretending active stupidity.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 06:04 pm (UTC)Gender-flipping Catwoman -- now that would be a neat trick.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 12:53 pm (UTC)On the other hand, I can actually see a woman in a House role: "I am not your damn mommy, I am your diagnostician. If you wanted someone to pat your hand, you should have made friends before you got sick." etc.
Possibly this is because I have known a few pretty damned abrasive female doctors.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 05:55 pm (UTC)I do like your notion of not flipping Cuddy. That would be a great chance to play with female friendship. (But I'm unconvinced by the House/Cuddy relationship anyway, so I wouldn't see de-romancing it as any loss.)
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 10:31 pm (UTC)But. When it's a question of where viewer sympathy goes, that's a very different thing. You don't have to be arguing that women never get away with something to argue that viewer sympathy ebbs if a female character tries it.
My main objection to fanfic that romanticizes non-romantic friendships (whether slash or hetero fanfic, I don't care) is that I feel like we have few enough really good filmed representations of friendship that I resent making them into romances. I see why the urge is there, and I don't actually want to stop anybody doing it. But I actually like having characters being able to display love for each other in non-romantic contexts without having everybody jump on it and say that it must be romantic love in disguise.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 10:51 pm (UTC)*The actual numbers are randomly chosen, though I kind of like the idea of using House as a unit of measurement: assholeishness per watt of brilliance, or something.
I agree with you on the friendship thing. In fact, although I don't object to slash overall, my main objection to slash is the way it eroticizes our reading of every emotionally significant relationship between men. Friends? Slashy. Enemies? Slashy. Superior and subordinate? Slashy. The only way to avoid those overtones is to have no emotional bond between them at all, and even then it may not work.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-05 02:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 03:56 am (UTC)(I do not find Cosette & Eponine worth anything other than EYEROLLS).
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 02:39 pm (UTC)But... yeah, and guy-Eponine just doesn't have the horizontal hostility with Cosette. Which, songs aside, is all the personality either seems to have...
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:12 pm (UTC)Didn't hurt that Enjolras was smokin' hot, of course.
But despite them leaving it out of the musical in an overt fashion -- DAMN it was still there.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:29 pm (UTC)And, here (http://books.google.com/books?id=5i5AAAAAYAAJ&dq=les%20miserables%20grantaire%20enjolras%20two%20at%20one%20shot&pg=PA51#v=onepage&q&f=false). Two of the slashiest pages you will ever read.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:41 pm (UTC)THAT'S LIKE DRINKING JAEGER BOMBS, WITH THE ALCOHOL TURNED UP TO ELEVEN
NO WONDER HE WAS SO DRUNK
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 04:05 am (UTC)I suppose gender swapped Marius and Cosette would do interesting things, there, too. (Except in the Castle in the Cloud parts, but I ignore those anyway.)
I want someone not-Heinlein to do the Libby change.
And I want to switch the main characters of Jane Eyre.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 04:07 am (UTC)http://www.goer.org/Journal/2009/10/the_gilmore_wire.html
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 04:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 05:31 am (UTC)Of course, the fact that her BSG role was a genderswap from the original 70s series Starbuck doesn't hurt.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 08:40 am (UTC)The book has changed shape a lot since then, but that's what I was trying for originally.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 11:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 01:05 pm (UTC)You could swap the whole lot of them and make it work, but if you just swap Prospero you undo the balance of the play.
Privilege is real, and characters who have always had privilege behave in ways that assume they have it. I mean to start with, how come Prospera inherits as duchess when she has a younger brother? So it's a different world, OK. And then you have the relationship between Prospero and Miranda, which is a fairly bad relationship between father and daughter and an appallingly abusive one between mother and daughter. And then you have the whole Sycorax/Caliban/Ariel thing. You can reverse everyone and change the world. Or not.
But the arrogance Prospero has is unchallenged privilege that lets him carry on thinking he was right even when he's been cast adrift on a boat for being a neglectful idiot and spent fifteen years on a desert island -- and while you can have a woman scholar wizard duchess, the world you need to get her to have that assumption of privilege is so far from the world that story can happen in that you've lost something essential.
When I do my character workshop with people the thing I ask about gender is "What is the interesting gender to make this character?" "How does it change the story?" I once for about half an hour thought about making Taveth in Lifelode male. It made her a lot more interesting, which completely defeated the point -- men doing traditional women things are subversive and exciting, women doing them are invisible and boring. The way to make them interesting is not to give them to men.
Lear, I think, would reverse quite easily. And I've thought a lot about what Hamlet would need.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 01:05 pm (UTC)This is the internet.
Date: 2011-03-04 01:52 pm (UTC)Re: This is the internet.
Date: 2011-03-04 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 02:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:46 pm (UTC)I love the idea of a female Javert! Also, your assumptions seem entirely reasonable to me. But then, I consistently impress my friends with my failure to recognize famous actors. There's Patrick Stewart, and there's Catherine Zeta-Jones, and then there are a bunch of others.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:49 pm (UTC)To riff off the Batman question above, how about Superman? Yes, I know there's Supergirl, but still, one of the fundamental things about Superman's character is that he's such the archetypal American As Apple Pie figure, and as such privileged in all sorts of directions. White, male, physically fit, muscular (even though he has super-strength enough that I don't know how those muscles got enough exercise to fill out spandex like they do), worked on a family farm but never in real poverty, now has a white-collar job in the city. If Superman were Lois Lane instead of Clark Kent, or were Clarice Kent, I'd be interested to see how the character's impression might shift.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 10:32 pm (UTC)Probably someone has already done a four-volume series on this. Heaven knows there are enough other things of that sort in comics, and I don't know even a tenth of them.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 11:51 pm (UTC)*Insofar as a fat woman in her fifties is regarded as a sexual being at all. It might be interesting for her to push past being a figure of fun, and use her intelligence and wealth to claim what power is available to her.