Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: The Subtle Art of Folding Space, by John Chu
- 2: Books read, early January
- 3: Books read, late December
- 4: 2025 short stuff rec list
- 5: Books read, early December
- 6: Platform Decay, by Martha Wells
- 7: Exactly what we needed
- 8: 2025 in writing (my stuff)
- 9: Books read, late November
- 10: Books read, early November
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 01:48 pm (UTC)In reference to other attributes, you will be unsurprised to read that I like detail and contextualization, so whether dry, entertaining, or charming, story notes/introductions are usually interesting to me, and thus appreciated. I like knowing things that colour my understanding of a story. It's all food for analysis. And wherever they appear in the physical book, I can choose to read or not read them in any order in relation to the story(s) they pertain to. Admittedly, it's easier if they are right next to the story in question. I have no problem with authorial statements of intent, or self analysis, in notes. Connecting the 'what were they thinking' with the story is one of the useful ways to look at how people understand how storytelling works. Notes about why the stories are in this particular collection, or in this order are also interesting in similar ways, just at a different level.
Re: sartorias' comment above, I can't recall having read story notes in collections laden with superlatives, but perhaps I've just been reading different collections. That or I've blocked them from memory. Usually if I see them, they're in blurbs, jacket copy, or occasionally in third party introductions, where one might expect to see them.
Re: presentation and professionalism. There are a great many areas of matter of taste that I don't have much to add to beyond that many of them don't seem to apply in my case beyond minimum construction and production standards, which are not so much to do with content. But on that note, I recall a pair of posts by Michelle, their comments and references that may or may not be of use to you: An open letter to Trade Publishers (http://msagara.livejournal.com/52146.html) More on covers (http://msagara.livejournal.com/52298.html)
Speaking of on a different level, I find the choice of buttons for these polls interesting. 'Very important', 'Moderately important', and 'Meh', can all be on a scale, which makes sense for a question asking for degree. 'Some other response…' makes sense as an option for those who aren't going to characterize their response in that fashion, so it can go as a button too. The remaining two do not answer the question as asked (i.e: in the 'how important' sense), especially 'I find them annoying and generally a distraction from the stories' in the question of professionalism. They may bear on the perception, but can be separated from degree in a way that I would have expected them to be ticky-boxes. 'Oh Brian you are such a Brian', yes?
On again a different level, I'm pleased about the prospect of a collection from you. While I've bought several magazines/e-zines in order to read stories of yours, it's nice to have them all in one place.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 05:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-15 05:37 am (UTC)