Vital question
Apr. 22nd, 2004 10:15 amSo, having poked the Not The Moose Book with a sharp stick enough times, I have discovered that it separates rather cleanly in twain. (I had just had a mad thought about putting Twain in one of the books in this series. NO. Stay focused, Mris.) And further that the first book, Thermionic Night, is rough-drafted. Its 120K length should have tipped me off that it was a book. Sometimes I'm rather slow about these things.
I have to edit like a mad thing to get it into any kind of public shape -- and I'm not going to do that until I'm done with the draft of Sampo, which was Part 2 and is now Book 2, because of "Bull Durham" -- that is, I'm not going to do it yet because of "Bull Durham," not that it's Book 2 because of "Bull Durham" -- maybe I should just quit now and start a new sentence. Have to edit like a mad thing, but the bones of the book are there and some flesh and functional organs, too.
The vital question before me -- and before you, dears, via e-mail or comment section -- relates to parties. You get to have a celebration of your choice when you finish a book. (In fact, for each book written you are allowed five celebrations, as described here.) I missed throwing the "book is drafted" party. The choices before me:
--skip all parties: who needs to celebrate anyway?
--wrap it in with the party for finishing Sampo, since they used to be pretending to be the same book anyway
--wrap it in with Mark's intended but unscheduled acquisition party, since Sun now owns his company and we now own a piece of Sun to sell off and use for happy things
--have a series of parties for each of these things separately, because, hey, any excuse!
I should mention that I have moose napkins, so skipping the parties entirely will result in their sad everyday use. Not that that should sway your answers. I'm just sayin'.
Talk to me, people.
I have to edit like a mad thing to get it into any kind of public shape -- and I'm not going to do that until I'm done with the draft of Sampo, which was Part 2 and is now Book 2, because of "Bull Durham" -- that is, I'm not going to do it yet because of "Bull Durham," not that it's Book 2 because of "Bull Durham" -- maybe I should just quit now and start a new sentence. Have to edit like a mad thing, but the bones of the book are there and some flesh and functional organs, too.
The vital question before me -- and before you, dears, via e-mail or comment section -- relates to parties. You get to have a celebration of your choice when you finish a book. (In fact, for each book written you are allowed five celebrations, as described here.) I missed throwing the "book is drafted" party. The choices before me:
--skip all parties: who needs to celebrate anyway?
--wrap it in with the party for finishing Sampo, since they used to be pretending to be the same book anyway
--wrap it in with Mark's intended but unscheduled acquisition party, since Sun now owns his company and we now own a piece of Sun to sell off and use for happy things
--have a series of parties for each of these things separately, because, hey, any excuse!
I should mention that I have moose napkins, so skipping the parties entirely will result in their sad everyday use. Not that that should sway your answers. I'm just sayin'.
Talk to me, people.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-22 08:40 am (UTC)Or wrapping it in the party for finishing Sampo.
Definitely use the moose napkins for a festive event! :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-04-22 08:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-22 08:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-22 09:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-22 09:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-22 09:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-22 10:41 am (UTC)Depends on what sort of party it is. Lot of work and lot of stress would make me vote for no parties and private use of napkins. Lot of fun and lot of food would make me vote for as many parties as possible, and if you must buy more napkins, well then, you must!
But then, my party tolerance is pretty low.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-22 12:11 pm (UTC)As for how many parties, well, I think the main thing is that moose napkins be used festively. I would tend to combine excuses into one party, but I think that I am much tireder than you are.
Pamela
no subject
Date: 2004-04-22 01:34 pm (UTC)I have to say, I think I'm a contender in the tiredy sweepstakes today specifically. I was glad to have lunch with Stella and Lydy, but I feel like one of them secretly hit me on the back of the head with a hammer at the end of it: I just want to kind of fold up.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-22 04:23 pm (UTC)You win for today, though. Nobody has metaphorically hit me on the back of the head with a hammer, or even a rock.
Pamela
no subject
Date: 2004-04-22 05:26 pm (UTC)Also, there are some people who don't want to let me have Not Very Bouncy days. I was in a role-playing group in college where I was often an active and vocal participant, but I had a bad night once and just wanted to be off on the edges being quiet. I kept coming up with reasons why my character would be off doing something else. And the others, subconsciously I think, were having none of it. One of them tackled me and knelt on my shoulders and tickled me until I couldn't breathe, because, darn it, I was supposed to be energetic and bouncy and fun.
Generally you can sing "The Wonderful Thing About Tiggers" song and substitute in Mrissas, although I will refrain from leaping in laps uninvited. But today I am not bouncy, jouncy, trouncy, or flouncy, much less fun fun fun fun fun.
What is this "finish a book" thing?
Date: 2004-04-22 12:18 pm (UTC)By that time, my thought isn't of parties, but of finally having it off my desk...
The time I want to have a party is when I get the first box of copies of the thing. The smell of the glue is still, after a fair number of years, pretty wonderful.
That said, any excuse/reason for a fun party is fine by me. Go with it.
Re: What is this "finish a book" thing?
Date: 2004-04-22 01:39 pm (UTC)Party on Garth!
Date: 2004-04-23 08:18 am (UTC)-kd