The Angst of Nel Gurgle
Mar. 15th, 2012 12:36 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Anyway. I have been watching Sandbaggers as part of the Ongoing Mrissa Spy Fiction Experience. It was kindly lent me by carbonel, and I am finding it quite useful for reminding me of spy things I do and do not want to be doing.
But oh lordy. What I am not doing is emotionally engaging with it.
Sandbaggers is a British show thirty years old, and this shows in various ways. The seasons are short--six or seven 45-minute episodes long--and filled to the brim with white men. There is some action but a lot of the politics and logistics of the spy game.
The main character is Neil Burnside, but I call him Nel Gurgle, because he has a Conspicuous Cool Black Leather Spy Coat (so does the real-life Nel Gurgle!) that he only wears when he is in Bulgaria doing spy things and not when he is home in the SAS office managing Swedish flight attendants--wait, I seem to have gotten that slightly wrong. Not when he is at home in the SIS office managing men spies. There was a woman spy once in a few episodes and he got her killed, and now he can never have a woman spy again. He has also gotten some men spies killed. Logically, this is why the department consists entirely of a cat, an iguana, and a one-legged budgie called Larry.
Sandbagger One: Actually I'm here to tell you Larry's gotten killed. Nel Gurgle: I am so torn up about Larry I will now stare at the Thames or other convenient body of water. Sandbagger One: I am considering resigning over Larry. Nel Gurgle: Damn. I won't stop you. Sandbagger One: Well, I won't resign until you can train Larry's replacement. Nel Gurgle: There won't be anybody qualified. Also I will expect you to emotionally invest in the replacement even though they will get killed in twenty minutes. Sandbagger One: I will promptly do so, and notify his parents of his death personally. [His parents swim around in a bowl, being goldfish, that being the only category of being left that Nel Gurgle has not gotten killed]
Seriously, it's as though they expected to spend half of every episode with us watching Kirk, Picard, or whoever getting all torn up about Ensign Redshirt. You can kill a dude every episode. Or you can spend all your time on Teh Grief 'N' Woez. But not both, Nel Gurgle! Not both!
Also, there is a completely loathsome series of exchanges between Nel Gurgle and his former father-in-law ("I object to people reminding me that he is my former father-in-law! Now I will use this relationship to my own ends!") wherein the former father-in-law is like, "Can't you at least meet my daughter for drinks? Because she wants to get back together, and she's driving me bazoo. And I will totally bribe you with foreign policy objectives just to get my obnoxious child out of my hair." And Nel Gurgle is like, "No way, dude, she is just too obnoxious even for foreign policy objectives." And dad-in-law is like, "Yeah, she is pretty obnoxious, due to the wanting you to do stuff outside work and craziness like that. Too bad she is my blood kin and I am stuck with her and could not, like, have raised her better and stuff!" And I watch these, and I think, "Run like the wind, ex-wife-slash-daughter! Run like the wind, British government! Obtain hobbies and/or civil servants who have the gumption to tell their relatives to get hobbies!"
And yet I appreciate the willingness to kill at least some named characters, which too much modern filmed spy fiction just does not have, and I appreciate moments where one obscure European spy group engages in kidnapping and skullduggery to pressure a random other European government to their own ends, and...yeah, there are definitely moments. But oh, Nel Gurgle...sometimes you need a good kicking, and angst is not the same.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 05:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 09:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-16 12:05 pm (UTC)Which is to say yes, North American accents on old British media were awful, just as bad as old British accents in North American media. This has got much better in both directions recently. I blame the Internet, or possibly Gwynneth Paltrow.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-16 12:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 06:46 pm (UTC)Also, when it comes to bringing in new agents, isn't that female agent also quite a lot less field experienced than some of the other Sandbaggers? In that case I'd expect his sense of reluctance to try again to stem from the same instinct that makes him very nearly equally reluctant to take on male newbies he regards as 'unqualified'. Yes, there's absolutely a Catch-22 in Neil's thinking -- how can anybody become 'qualified' if he won't take them on to let them try? -- but that seems to me illustrative of the untenable position Neil is in more generally. The Sandbaggers are expected to do Rolls-Royce spy work with less than a Ford Cortina budget, with masters who deliberately and almost systematically undermine the work, and with remarkably small technical and human resources to draw on. The show makes the job look nigh on to impossible.
That's in fact what I found most refreshing about the series: the way it serves as a deflating antidote to the James Bond mythos, particularly the James Bond films, of the same time period. In The Sandbaggers, the business of international spying is portrayed as not at all glamorous, as under-funded, subject to undermining by unrelated political and bureaucratic brangles at home, and as definitely not always successful. This portrayal runs completely counter to the vision of an aging Roger Moore or Sean Connery swanning about in a tuxedo with a supermodel on one arm and a rocket launcher in the other. Instead the offices are ugly and understaffed, the carpet is threadbare, the furniture dated, and the biggest issue of the day is not locating the secret underwater hide-out of the international criminal mastermind, but justifying the cost of commercial flights to get your agents where you need them in the field.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 07:05 pm (UTC)So yes, he's in a catch-22 with "nobody is good enough or can ever get good enough," and that part is both more interesting and more sympathetic than, "Look, an accurate portrayal of one of the many factors leading to men of that era making excuses for standing in the way of women of that era and patting themselves on the back for it."
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 08:42 pm (UTC)The "handshake" is a very tenuous connection, anyway. I was two handshakes from both Chairman Mao AND Chiang Kai Shek (or whatever the preferred transliterations are), and I've never studied Chinese language or history (just their cooking, and that not formally). ("Was" since everybody involved except me is dead).
no subject
Date: 2012-03-16 07:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 09:53 pm (UTC)