mrissa: (mrischief)
[personal profile] mrissa
But they are wrong; I dress myself this way.

I just got a rejection from a market from which I have no active submissions. Sadly it's not one of those lovely organized ones that gives you a submission tracking number or replies directly to an e-mail, so I can't see what was rejected. They just will not be able to use "your story." (It's a fairly limited market, so I'm absolutely sure I have no active submissions there.)

This is one of the times where it's really good to be experienced in the business, because I can shrug and go, "Either staff turnover or computer glitch," and joke about really REALLY not wanting whatever I sent them last (I believe I had a hat?) and move on with my life rather than panicking about what I did wroooooong to get rejected twice, so emphatically, maybe they want me to never submit there again even though they've published me before, or, OMG, maybe I accidentally submitted something that was totally wrong for them and now they hate me OMG, and...seriously, folks. This is one of the reasons being 80+ story sales into your career is so much better. Not everything is tinged with frightful significance. Editors are human, publishers are human, and they have moments of confusion and computer malfunction, and everybody goes on without the obligatory panic and overthinking.

I post this even though the people who are still in the panic and overthinking stage will probably have to get through that stage themselves, with their own experience rather than mine, just to say: hey. You, too, can come out the other side and mutter, "Mornin', Ralph. Rough day, huh?" at the editors. It will be okay.

Date: 2012-04-13 12:03 pm (UTC)
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
From: [personal profile] redbird
It's good to have the equanimity, or the basis for same.

Date: 2012-04-13 12:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaeldthomas.livejournal.com
It wasn't us, right?

Date: 2012-04-13 12:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Hee, no, nothing to do with you.

Date: 2012-04-13 12:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
(Mornin', Ralph.)

(Rough day anyway despite not double-rejecting me?)

Date: 2012-04-13 01:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sksperry.livejournal.com
I'm starting to wonder if agents and publishers have caught on to me, and are sending me preemptive rejections. "Dear Mr. Perry, we've heard you've written a new book and would just like to take this opportunity to say 'Don't bother'. Thanks."
Edited Date: 2012-04-13 01:16 pm (UTC)

Date: 2012-04-13 02:56 pm (UTC)

Date: 2012-04-13 07:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
That is a much friendlier universe than the universe in which they are likely to say to most writers, "Uh, who?"

Date: 2012-04-13 06:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scott-lynch.livejournal.com
"Phantom pre-rejection" is definitely one of the coolest feathers for a writer's cap I've heard of in a long time. Ain't nothin' like this ever happened to me... ;)

Date: 2012-04-14 06:29 am (UTC)
ckd: (cpu)
From: [personal profile] ckd
Heh. I got an email recently trying to recruit me for a job position, where by "me" I mean "someone who apparently has a similar name and a LinkedIn profile".

Yes, it was for a computer-related job, but the email was clearly meant for someone who:
- works (or recently worked) for a company I have never worked for
- in a city on the wrong side of the continent
- in a role which is not a role I have ever worked in

and, the kicker:
- was interested in coming to work for my current employer.

Date: 2012-04-14 11:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
"Would you, CKD, like to get paychecks from $current employer?" "Uh, yes. Yes I would. Preferably without interruption."

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 8th, 2026 12:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios