Schooling

Jan. 9th, 2005 08:48 pm
mrissa: (question)
[personal profile] mrissa
E-mail conversation with [livejournal.com profile] columbina has me wondering about a lot of things. I'm going to write more about some of them in a bit (that is, not today), but until then I'd like to ask a slew of questions. Answer some, all, or none of them, as you like.

Did you have a good high school experience? (For those of you outside the US, this question applies to your schooling in your late teen years, somewhere between 14 and 18 for the typical student.) What do you think is most wrong with the way your schooling at that age was conducted? Do you have anything you think was institutionally most right with how your schooling was conducted? (By institutionally, I mean that "Ron Gabriel, my ninth and twelfth grade English teacher, is so awesome" doesn't count unless the school specifically nurtured his awesomeness. Which it didn't. Rotten bastards. You do not use a person's disability against him. This is not acceptable human behavior.)

Do you have stronger, less strong, or similar feelings towards grade school? Junior high/middle school? If you went to college, college? If you went to grad school, grad school? If someone says "your school," which one do you think of? (That presumes that you're not currently working in any capacity at a school that's becoming "yours.")

Did you have one best year of your schooling, where you were learning the most and figuring out the most about yourself? Did you have more than one? Did you have one worst year? Did they correspond with best/worst years otherwise, or did you separate out your school life and your outside/home life?

Was there a time in your schooling when you really enjoyed the books assigned to you to read? What kind of books were they, or, if you remember, what books? Did you otherwise manage to find good books to read, mostly, or did you go through dry spells in your reading life when you were younger?


My high school was a wretched experience, as growing numbers of you on the friendslist know firsthand. I think the most offensively wrong thing about it is that no one in charge actually seemed to care whether individual students were learning anything or not. There were a lot of wrong things competing for the honor of most wrong, though, and total orderings etc. etc. I don't think RHS did a lot right, institutionally, although there were individual teachers who did their best in a very flawed system.

I have stronger feelings towards college because my alma mater, for all its flaws, was mine: I chose it, and I chose my major. I was stuck with Blumfield Elementary, Ralston Middle School, and RHS. Gustavus I chose. If you separate out Gustavus Physics from Gustavus Adolphus College, it is the closest thing I have to blind patriotism. [livejournal.com profile] markgritter and [livejournal.com profile] timprov are still bringing me out of "My Department, Right Or Wrong," ("My Professors, Drunk Or Sober" actually might have applied from time to time -- certainly more often than that general sentiment applies to my mother). Whenever I'm reading something where people give their countrymen sanctuary just for being fellow exiles or what have you, the way I get into the mindset is to imagine that it's some Gustie physics geek. Or maybe a Gustie gamer geek. Just a Gustie isn't enough. Aaaaaanyway, I have pretty vivid memories of grade school and junior high, but it's not as much a hot button as high school is. And grad school sucked but is not a very important chapter in my life: I forgive people who don't know me very well for forgetting I was ever in it.

My seventh grade year was probably my best year of schooling, but I've had better years of learning or of personal growth. I had Marylyn Bremmer and Mr. Lesch and Mr. Fishhead Troutman, and [livejournal.com profile] scottjames and I were doing all kinds of geeky fun stuff that actually had something to do with school and not just, y'know, making our own geeky fun. My middle year of high school -- since I skipped one and clearly had a freshman year and a senior year, you can call the middle one sophomore or junior, as you like -- was probably my worst. Other years have had their low spots, to be sure, but the middle year of high school was the most consistently bad. Well...my grad school year was bad, too, but I did quit, and I wrote Fortress of Thorns in the meantime, and I think I learned quite a lot of unrelated stuff.

It occurs to me that 12 and 15 are my "resonant ages" for writing YAs. Huh. I'd known 12 -- 12 is my year, my mental age and all that. (Making me, from my understanding of previous con panels and conversations, younger than [livejournal.com profile] pameladean but older than [livejournal.com profile] sdn.) But I hadn't spotted 15 as my worst year, which it was. Huh.

I enjoyed the books Marylyn assigned my seventh grade class. Mythology. Ray Bradbury. Mark Twain. "Julius Caesar" with Marylyn doing recitations for us. I'm not sure how much of that was Marylyn herself -- I might fling myself into who knows what, for her sake -- I'd give the woman a kidney, heaven knows I could give her a bit of Sylvia Plath if it would make her happy -- but part of Marylyn being Marylyn herself was that she had us reading The Illustrated Man and not some illustrated abridged nonsense. I never really had a gap in finding books I wanted to read. Seventh grade was also a year in which books I wanted to read totally exploded, because I heard the news that there were genre labels that would give me a much higher probability of giving a damn, and off I went. No wonder I reach for 12 when I want to write books.

But 15 has its promising bits, too; I'll have to think on that.

Anyway. You?

Re: great expectations

Date: 2005-01-10 03:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aet.livejournal.com
No, you misunderstood me. If there are more than 30 persons in class, then the teacher has to leave the kids like you, who are too fast , and the kids like me, who are too slow (and,of course, it did not make me fail - I was privileged, too, with parents. Being slow just meant I did not finish cum laude), and to work with the middle ones. And I realize that with your case society loses, in the end, but in my case lesson to blend in and observe to learn the rules (sad, of course, that rules without filling can make it possible to get diplomas) is enough, a necessary one for the system to go on working.

Also, do not you think you were too privileged (in good brains and good parents department) to say "It did not give me any access!" Or did you really go to school where all the study was done in foreign language? Were most of books on your parents shelves, in libraries and in shops in foreign language?

Re: great expectations

Date: 2005-01-10 03:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
If you set up a system where something like half the kids are being ignored for one reason or another, that is a problem with the system. That is not the kids' problem. That is the system's problem. And it isn't an inherent problem: nothing says you have to have exactly those 30 students arranged into exactly that class. Perpetuating that system is not necessary and not a good thing. Changing it to a system that actually teaches children is much better. If you keep saying, "Shut up, keep your head down, follow the rules, it could be worse," it will be worse. We're part of the system now, and if we don't try to figure out what works and what doesn't work for a variety of kids, we will make sure the system fails the next generation more drastically.

If I'd gone to a school where all the study was done in a foreign language, there might have been something new to me there! My parents' shelves, the (non-school) library's shelves, and bookstores' shelves had nothing to do with what the school was doing or failing to do. Sure, you can easily come up with worse circumstances. But we can always do worse. We're good at doing worse. The point is to do better. So yes, I was privileged to have smart parents and good bookstores in the area. But that doesn't mean that the school and its administrators weren't an obstacle, and weren't deliberately an obstacle, rather than an aid or a neutral point, in learning.

Re: great expectations

Date: 2005-01-10 04:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aet.livejournal.com
"nothing says you have to have exactly those 30 students arranged into exactly that class"

you are more right than you know - in specialized schools, considered to be better, there are 48 pupils per class. And who fall behind are weeded out to thse small 30 people classes

Re: great expectations

Date: 2005-01-10 05:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aet.livejournal.com
PS, I hope we are talking "class" in same meaning - I understand in USA the same classful of 30 something people do not take all the same classes together (with ex. of sports, home ec. and foreign language, when the class is made to two groups).

Re: great expectations

Date: 2005-01-10 05:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Ah, no. We use "class" inconsistently in the US. Sometimes it means "the people who are taking home ec./chemistry/etc. at the same time," and other times it means "the people who will graduate from a school at the same time."

A 30-person class would be anomalously small for a public school graduating class that wasn't in a farming community. It would be reasonable for the group of kids who were all learning algebra in the same room at the same time.

Re: great expectations

Date: 2005-01-10 08:18 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
You still did not get it. We had 3 parallel graduating classes. Each of the groups studied separately (and could have slightly different additional subjects: class A had advanced math and programming, class B had advanced Russian and typing in Russian; class C was regular one, with no specialty). The group of 30 in class was supposed to be a collective, supposedly so in studies and social activities, making up a separate organization of the Young Communist League, taking part in the socialist competition as an unit and so on.

Aet

Re: great expectations

Date: 2005-01-10 08:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
You're right, I didn't get it: when you asked about your understanding of a "class" in the US, I thought you were wondering about "classes" in the US. Silly me.

Re: great expectations

Date: 2005-01-10 08:29 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I guess your answer means: "No, this kind of classes were not common is schools I studied in." Thank you for the explanation.

Aet

Re: great expectations

Date: 2005-01-10 05:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
I'd rather be in a well-taught class of 60 than a poorly-taught class of 10, and I have experience with each.

But no one ever said that the experiences you've had are as good as it can possibly get. Aspiring to improve things is good.

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 3rd, 2026 11:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios