Stupid adjectives anyway
Jun. 2nd, 2004 09:07 pmI'm not winsome, am I? I got called winsome today, and Mark assured me I'm not, but
timprov thinks I might be. You know who's winsome, is people in Louisa May Alcott books. Not even the good ones, either; the ones like Rose and for heaven's sake Amy.
But Timprov says I must be, because people sometimes like me right off the bat.
Then again, the person who applied this adjective to me used one of those complimentary-but-not-really adjectives on
porphyrin, or at least on her butt, so maybe I just shouldn't worry about it.
But Timprov says I must be, because people sometimes like me right off the bat.
Then again, the person who applied this adjective to me used one of those complimentary-but-not-really adjectives on
no subject
Date: 2004-06-02 08:41 pm (UTC)(And no, I don't see you as winsome either. Winsome is bunnies and Snow White and tykes who sing endearingly not-quite-on-key.)
no subject
Date: 2004-06-03 07:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-03 05:31 am (UTC)Bah, yes, a bad word all the way around, but perhaps this person is thinking of comparisons (though comparisons are odious), and comparing you to, say, other women who can probably do math. (I assume you can, because of the physics thing. My dear friend Stephanie has had to contend with a certain amount of winsome-accusation, though maybe not that precise word, because she's a woman who does math, perhaps the only woman in her subfield, though I'd have to double-check. She credits it all to the daily bathing which many of the men in her subfield (and her field in general) ignore.)
I agree with Peg. Amy was way too self-centered to be winsome. However, Anne of Green Gables might have been winsome. If not her, then Diana Barry. Depending on which connotation you're going with.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-03 07:32 am (UTC)I can, in fact, do math. And bathe. Sometimes simultaneously.
Diana, for heaven's sake. Oh dear oh dear oh dear dear dear.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-03 08:14 am (UTC)Winsome
Date: 2004-06-03 08:22 am (UTC)Re: Winsome
Date: 2004-06-03 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-03 12:03 pm (UTC)But it's not, in my head, a blatantly ridiculous term to apply to you, if one *is* going to apply it to somebody today. It fits your physical appearance moderately well, but not your personality, for me. But the word, as I understand it in my head, is more about physical appearances than what people are actually like.
I haven't looked up what various dictionaries say the term means; it will be interesting to see if the meanings in my head have anything to do with the official meanings!
no subject
Date: 2004-06-03 12:27 pm (UTC)Pamela
no subject
Date: 2004-06-03 01:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-04 06:52 am (UTC)Come to think of it, though, if a person is not a ScanAm, as you like to call them, they could misinterpret your body language and see you as winsome. Personality-wise, definitely not. Speaking of which, did we ever figure out which one in the group of three with you, me, and Jen you would be? :) Definitely not the winsome one.
Heathah
no subject
Date: 2004-06-04 07:16 am (UTC)