Spoiled

Sep. 14th, 2004 09:02 pm
mrissa: (Default)
[personal profile] mrissa
[livejournal.com profile] markgritter made kung pao. Mmmmm, kung pao. He did not dispute the rule about getting whatever dessert you want when you've had doctors poking bits of things into you, so I had the last of the raspberry fudge on some vanilla ice cream. It was good, but I keep wanting it to taste like the raspberry chocolate sauce [livejournal.com profile] timprov and I make. Which is easier to get anyway, so now we'll just do that next time. Also it is thundering.

I am so spoiled.

Mark does dispute another important rule, as discussed Saturday night, which is this: if you generally would hug someone goodbye, and you have done so, and then you talk for a sufficient length of time after that, you get another hug.

Mark claims this is a selfish ploy to get more hugs*. Well, duh. But really: there are hugs for hello and goodbye, and there are other hugs, and if you don't go away, you haven't said goodbye. So it became another kind of hug somewhere mid-conversation, and you are still due your goodbye hug if you would generally get one.

Say you are on the phone, and you say, "Okay, goodbye" in the middle, and the other person says, "Wait, now, when were you going to come over to eat my food and drink my beverages?", and further conversation ensues. You don't then get to just hang up whenever you feel done, on the theory that you already said goodbye. You still need to indicate to the other person that you're done. Proper goodbyes must be exchanged. (If the other person refuses to participate in proper goodbyes, the procedure may be altered to, "GoodBYE, [friend's name].")

The very easiest way to work this (with the hugs, not the phone) is to be in a conversation with more than one person. So then every time you move like you're going away, you get another entire round of hugs. Minnesota Long Goodbyes may have their origins in the weather, but their fruits are entirely more pleasant than sleet.

Wiser people than I have pointed out that I am a cuddly person. I do not dispute this. But really: more hugs or fewer hugs? And not from your smelly great-aunt-by-marriage that you wish your great-uncle had left out of the family entirely but from people of whom you would usually like hugs? It's a good rule, is what I'm saying. It's a just and reasonable rule. I stick by the rule. This, too, may make me spoiled. So be it. I will be spoiled, and cuddly, and hugged several times.

I really like my life.

*[livejournal.com profile] timprov's new theory is that most rules are designed to selfishly maximize one's own hugs or selfishly minimize hugs to people one doesn't like. There may be something to this.

Date: 2004-09-14 07:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] merriehaskell.livejournal.com
Oh, now you must explain for the non-Minnesotans, please. "Minnesota Long Goodbyes?"

Date: 2004-09-14 07:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
I'm not sure what's to explain. You announce your intended departure, and you get up from your seat and move towards the door. Your hosts move with you. Then you keep talking. You may at some point start putting on your shoes, if you take them off at that locale, or your winter gear, if it's winter. You keep talking. You hug goodbye. You keep talking. It's a scientific fact that there's more to say when you're standing up, even if it's less comfortable saying it. You may end up, in nice weather, standing next to the car, still talking. It is all part of the MN Long Goodbye.

Sometimes you tell yourself this is because you like the people you're bidding farewell a heck of a lot and don't get to see them that often. This logic breaks down if you have plans to see them in the next, say, week.

Amateurs have MN Long Goodbyes of 20-30 minutes. Real pros...well, let's just say that my aunties stayed with my grandmother for 3/4 of August, and may have been saying goodbye after the first day for all I know.

Date: 2004-09-14 09:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] retrobabble.livejournal.com
*raised eyebrows* I think you just described my French-Canadian family. Are you sure we're not related? *g*

Date: 2004-09-15 08:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
After WorldCon...no. Not sure at all, actually.

Date: 2004-09-15 04:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] merriehaskell.livejournal.com
I was having a hard time seeing where Minnesota fit into it, and I think it may have developed from, as you said, putting on the cold weather gear. It'd be rude not to talk to someone while they're putting all that stuff on, right? So, it's merely a cultural holdover into summers. Right. I get it now. :)

Date: 2004-09-15 07:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mechaieh.livejournal.com
A high school best friend and I used to have a ritual: when we thought we were ready to get off of the phone, one of us would say "Eins," the other would reply "Zwei," and we were then supposed to say "Drei" together -- but usually one of us would interrupt with something else that needed saying for at least the first seven rounds.

Date: 2004-09-15 08:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
[livejournal.com profile] scottjames and I have a protocol with topic warnings. About half an hour before one of us has to get off the phone, that person will say, "Okay, major topic warning." So if we've been putting off something big and serious we've wanted to talk about, that's the time. About five minutes before having to get off the phone, the line is, "Minor topic warning," so if you've got a really great story you've just forgotten to tell so far but definitely wanted to remember, there's your chance. It works pretty well, especially because it isn't infinite: major topics can last more than half an hour and be followed by a minor thing or two, but there's a sense of winding things up, not just talking infinitely.

Date: 2004-09-14 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mechaieh.livejournal.com
I like the dessert rule, especially since I just gave blood (twice. They fucked up again and had to stick both arms). Definitely time for Scotch and Haagen-Dazs.

Date: 2004-09-14 07:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
What flavor of Haagen-Dazs goes with Scotch? For Scotch-drinkers, I mean, because for me the answer is "none, run away screaming."

Date: 2004-09-14 07:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mechaieh.livejournal.com
Well, I wasn't thinking of having them at the same time. Currently sipping Edradour; chocolate in the freezer. (There's a heavy, sweetish single-malt called Strathisla that might be interesting with desserts, though. Hmmm.)

Date: 2004-09-16 09:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] columbina.livejournal.com
Vanilla, honey, and malt flavors go reasonably well with Scotch - so Toscanini's Malted Vanilla ice cream might work.

But mostly Scotch goes with nothing except Scotch.

I have been known to drink good bourbon with a tiny amount of dark, dark chocolate. If you ever get your hands on Lu's Petit Escolier cookies (the extra-dark-chocolate variety; there are three kinds) and some Knob Creek or equivalent at the same time, try it.

Desserts

Date: 2004-09-14 08:12 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
You mean you don't just get the desert of your choice whenever you want? :)

Heathah

Re: Desserts

Date: 2004-09-15 08:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
No, I don't generally get to demand that we drive up to Ciao Bella when everybody is tired just because I have a craving for huckleberry gelato. I can ask, but I can't demand.

My dessert request of last night counts as "letting them off easily," since it took 2 minutes and involved ingredients already present in the house.

Re: Desserts

Date: 2004-09-16 06:24 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I need to go out to eat with you once in a while. I haven't tried Ciao Bella or First Course and they both sound like fun. We get out once in a while, but being that we're in the trying to eat at home more mode we don't get to go out to new places nearly often enough.

Heathah

Re: Desserts

Date: 2004-09-16 06:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Sure, we can do that. If we go to First Course, it should probably be for a weekend lunch or a weekday dinner, because it's a tiny restaurant, and if I bring my usual bunch and you bring your usual bunch, that's a pretty big usual bunch for a restaurant of that size.

Date: 2004-09-14 08:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] careswen.livejournal.com
But really: more hugs or fewer hugs?

More hugs, all the way. Mmmm.

Date: 2004-09-14 10:27 pm (UTC)
landofnowhere: (Default)
From: [personal profile] landofnowhere
Sadly, in general most of the hugs I have gotten are online (although I hope this will change) but the bonus hug policy definitely still holds. More hugs for all!

Date: 2004-09-15 08:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
You're at college now. College is great for hugs. Or at least, it can be.

Date: 2004-09-15 06:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] songwind.livejournal.com
I'm with you on the hugs. I'm all about the hugs. I went through a despair-filled period of time where many of my friends were anti-hug, but that seems largely amended now.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
1112131415 1617
18192021222324
252627 28293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 29th, 2026 02:06 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios