mrissa: (reading)
[personal profile] mrissa
Lloyd Alexander, The Beggar Queen. Discussed elsewhere.

Thomas Cahill, How the Irish Saved Civilization: The Untold Story of Ireland's Heroic Role from the Fall of Rome to the Rise of Medieval Europe. One of the things I gave Grandpa for Christmas on the theory that it might be entertaining. It...didn't really do what it said on the label. It spent a great deal of time on defining what Mr. Cahill considers civilization and why it's worth saving. It spent some time on early Irish history. Then, boom, Irish monks start monasteries all over the continent, civilization saved from barbarian hordes (=my people), rah rah rah well done skool skool skool, and we're done. The monasteries all over the continent, how they worked, what opposition they felt--all of that could make a very good book. But it would have been a much more scholarly book than Cahill was really aiming to write. Oh well. It was a fast read, for sure.

C.J. Cherryh, Regenesis. I loved Cyteen. This sequel had the Cyteen nature. That is all I wanted. It also cohered, and did better SF interior design than anything else I recall. That was all a bonus, because what I really wanted was "more like that," and I got more like that, and I was pleased. (And amazed. How hard is it to write "more like that" and hit the mark after this hiatus? Uff da.)

Georgette Heyer, Charity Girl. Predictable. Mildly enjoyable along the way.

Sharon Kay Penman, Devil's Brood. The end of her Henry II/Eleanor trilogy. Big and chewy and faintly purple in spots, but the early Plantagenets sort of encourage purply prose. (Hmm. I'm not sure the late ones discourage it much either.) Now I have the urge to go reread her Welsh border wars trilogy, in part to see where it joins up with this one, but that's really quite a lot of Penman all at once, so it'll almost certainly go on the back burner.

Malcolm Pryce, Don't Cry for Me Aberystwyth. Fourth in its series. Surreal and noir and funny and Welsh and...stuff. Now with bonus international spy stuff! I wish we got these in the US, but I suppose I can sort of see where they might be just on the other side of what one would really expect an American audience to buy. Still, I was very grateful to have a friend willing to bring it back from the UK for me.

Anthony Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450-1680: Volume One: The Lands Below the Winds. Good stuff. Cultural history of Southeast Asia, focusing on the period before Western influence became very strong and in the early period of Western influence. I was not expecting to be reminded of Icelandic history, but in one way I was: that the influence of external empires and religions pushed a region of comparative gender equity towards less gender equity, but not entirely successfully. Interesting stuff. It's got festivals, it's got things about harvesting, it's got stuff about hairstyles, and it does all this cultural stuff while keeping sight of variations and making a point of where a source is telling us more about the source than about the culture it was observing, which happened with outside Christian, Islamic, Confucian, and Buddhist sources. It's often frustrating to try to find books that acknowledge that Southeast Asia has any history aside from the wars of the 20th century. This is one of that does so in fascinating detail.

Patricia Wrede, Thirteenth Child. This book has been discussed a great deal elsewhere and has drawn more assumptions and misconceptions than just about any book I've ever heard of. I started out trying to correct misconceptions and did it about three times before it became clear to me that repeating, "No, Thirteenth Child doesn't do that thing you're objecting to! It does something else you find offensive!" was not particularly useful to me or to anybody else. Especially because the central point of discussion--the complete absence of First Nations/Native American people from the Americas of this book--was not, in fact, one of those misconceptions. Not every extrapolated objection you read on the internet is to something that's actually in Thirteenth Child. That one is. Clearly. And I have felt very geek-twitchy on the, "Actually the constant is 6.673, not 6 2/3," front, while simultaneously noticing that responding to someone talking about a major issue they're discussing by correcting them on a minor point is not generally helpful. So I moved from the talking to the listening about this book, and I'm going to keep listening to multiple people and learning from the commentary--not just in the points various people make that I think are dead on, either about the book itself or about related issues, but also in its points of divergence from what Thirteenth Child actually does, because that's interesting and valuable information, too.

Date: 2009-05-16 03:07 pm (UTC)
ext_6283: Brush the wandering hedgehog by the fire (Default)
From: [identity profile] oursin.livejournal.com
On the Plantagenets, there's an entertaining (though I haven't read it for decades, so maybe it wouldn't hold up) family-saga novel by Clemence Dane, Broome Stages, which rewrites the early P's as a C19th-early C20th thespian dynasty. So appropriate, no? Isn't there also an early-ish Susan Howatch which does it with a Cornish family of approx the same period?

I wonder if there are more 'inspired by' sagas out there.

Date: 2009-05-16 04:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Oh, lovely! That sounds like such a great idea. Possibly it would be less terrifying when the stakes were a theatre company rather than a government.

Do you have an idea which Howatch it is? I don't know her work at all, and my library has several things by her.

Date: 2009-05-16 04:34 pm (UTC)
ext_6283: Brush the wandering hedgehog by the fire (Default)
From: [identity profile] oursin.livejournal.com
I think it's Penmarric; there's another one (?Cashelmara) which is Edwards I-III done as an Irish Ascendancy family with Mortimer as a Fenian.

Date: 2009-05-16 05:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adrian-turtle.livejournal.com
It must be Penmarric. That's the only Susan Howatch book I've ever read more than a chapter of, and I recognized it from your description above. I think I must have picked it up in middle school, when my only framework for Plantagenets was "A Proud Taste for Scarlet and Miniver."

Date: 2009-05-16 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Lovely, thanks. I think I remember that they had those.

Date: 2009-05-16 03:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zalena.livejournal.com
I felt the same about the Cahill book and agree with all your criticisms. I liked it and think it's a great introduction to a lot of material, but the title should be a warning, not an enticement.

Also: It's probably the best of his books. His middle ages book made me crazy with how it failed to defend it's title: Mysteries of the Middle Ages: The Rise of Feminism, Science, and Art from the Cults of Catholic Europe

But I still think his books are a good introduction to the material for someone who hasn't encountered it before, especially with regard to the structure and organization of the early church.

Date: 2009-05-16 04:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
He also has a very firm grasp on which aspects of structural/doctrinal Christianity are not even second cousins with "always true/believed," historically speaking, which makes me happy.

Date: 2009-05-16 04:12 pm (UTC)
aedifica: Me with my hair as it is in 2020: long, with blue tips (Default)
From: [personal profile] aedifica
I would love to read a book that lived up to the title you mention!

Date: 2009-05-16 06:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zalena.livejournal.com
I would too! It is entirely possible that the title is what ruined the book. If it had been called Illustrated Mini Biographies of Already Well-Known Medieval Personalities I might have enjoyed it more!

Likewise, How the Irish Saved Civilization could be called, How Christianity Spread to Ireland and Inspired Monks to Copy Lots of Books and Share Them with Their Neighbors..

Date: 2009-05-16 07:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
Why Christianity is Nicer With Early Irish Influence And Would Have Been Nicer Yet If Only We'd Listened To Them More is another possible title that occurs to me.

Date: 2009-05-17 11:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fidelioscabinet.livejournal.com
I started taking Cahill with a grain of salt when I found him quoting Victor Davis Hanson with approval on something about the Greeks. Because when the names of the great classical scholars and classicists of the late 20th/early 21st centuries are listed, um, not anywhere near the top, shall we say. Maybe he was hoping for a blurb in return for the name-check, or something.

Date: 2009-05-17 11:38 pm (UTC)
keilexandra: Adorable panda with various Chinese overlays. (Default)
From: [personal profile] keilexandra
Bah, I was doing so well keeping up with the Westmark book club, but I still haven't read BEGGAR QUEEN (or any other books, for that matter). Soon, I hope.

I think you should post in your own space about THIRTEENTH CHILD. Don't keep correcting minor points, and always listen, but don't be silent either.

Date: 2009-05-18 01:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com
I think this is one of the times where the difference between silent and silenced is important.

Date: 2009-05-18 01:57 am (UTC)
keilexandra: Adorable panda with various Chinese overlays. (Default)
From: [personal profile] keilexandra
If you want to be silent, by all means do so. You should not, however, feel obligated to be silent; speech and listening are not mutually exclusive, so long as one isn't screaming loud enough to drown out other voices.

May 2026

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17 181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 21st, 2026 02:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios