Two Gender Yargs
Nov. 1st, 2004 04:26 pmSo here I am looking through children's market listings, making notes, and I came upon this statement, quoted verbatim from the publisher in question: "We want nonfiction specfiically targeted to girls. If the approach would appeal to boys as well as girls, it is not right for American Girl Library."
This reflects a view of both boys and girls that is so alien to me that I can hardly even count how many fundamentla disagreements I have with this mindset. It's a very good thing I have no intention of writing for American Girl Library nor ever have, or my dream would be hereby crushed.
And then, the Victoria's Secret holiday catalog arrived. They always send this ridiculous thing, where you can order two sweaters, five pairs of panties, and a safari, or something stupid like that. This time, on page four, it reads, "No matter what role you play, underneath it all, every woman is an angel."
What freakin' year is this? 1886? Honestly!!! Every woman is an angel my lily-white angelic ASS!
This reflects a view of both boys and girls that is so alien to me that I can hardly even count how many fundamentla disagreements I have with this mindset. It's a very good thing I have no intention of writing for American Girl Library nor ever have, or my dream would be hereby crushed.
And then, the Victoria's Secret holiday catalog arrived. They always send this ridiculous thing, where you can order two sweaters, five pairs of panties, and a safari, or something stupid like that. This time, on page four, it reads, "No matter what role you play, underneath it all, every woman is an angel."
What freakin' year is this? 1886? Honestly!!! Every woman is an angel my lily-white angelic ASS!
Re: Bras, Angels and Prostitutes
Date: 2004-11-01 05:56 pm (UTC)I was concerned about the 13-year-old who came to my door in a Playboy bunny costume. I really think that that many inhibitions, at least, could have been maintained. If nothing else, she was freezing her fluffy little tail off. I was not convinced that she could have handled any male attention that came her way.
This slut/nice girl dichotomy is coming awfully close to the angel/whore thing for my comfort, I have to say. It seems awfully one dimensional as a way to judge whether a woman is "nice." But in any case, I wouldn't worry about being attracted to a "nice" girl; as an old married person, I can tell you that scruffy horrible clothes can start to look awfully cuddly on the right person.
Re: Bras, Angels and Prostitutes
Date: 2004-11-01 07:05 pm (UTC)Re: Bras, Angels and Prostitutes
Date: 2004-11-01 07:10 pm (UTC)Kind of like the dress-shopping mantra, really: you look fine. The shirts look wretched, but you look fine.
Re: Bras, Angels and Prostitutes
Date: 2004-11-01 07:40 pm (UTC)Playboy bunny costumes at thirteen seem awfully close to the "bought into the dominant paradigm" problem, and I agree that it's not an appropriate costume for that age.
The dichotomy comes too close to my own comfort levels, for that matter. I agree with you intellectually about it being one-dimensional and simplistic thinking; I'm just not sure my emotional age has matured to that level. Appearances tend to be confusing. All in all, I probably worry about this far too much. Apologies.
Mack
Re: Bras, Angels and Prostitutes
Date: 2004-11-01 08:25 pm (UTC)No need to apologize. Thinking at it all from different angles is allowed.