Like So Totally, Like, Annoying!
Jan. 10th, 2005 09:17 amI am not a fan of censorship. You all probably know this by now. But if no one ever in the world ever ever ever wrote another story in cutesy ditzy teenage girl voice, I swear we would still have at least enough of those stories. At least.
Take Mike Resnick's story in Janis Ian's Stars anthology. (Do I have to say "please" here, or will you take the pleading for granted?) It starts out, "He's GORGEOUS! I mean, it's as if Morvich and Casabella and that old guy, Michael something, you know, the one who painted some big ceiling, as if they all got together and said, what's the most beautiful thing we can paint, the most beautiful thing in all the galaxy?"
If you read that and thought, "I hate the narrator and find her unbelievable and could not possibly care about anything she does ever," you are not alone. Later, the reader who is unwary enough to continue is treated to the gem, "He wasn't there today. I came home and cried and counted 51 ways to kill myself, but then I cracked a nail and had to go to the beautician to get the acrylic fixed." Oh, HA! Ha HA! Mike Resnick, you are so much with the funny!
Teenage dialect is hard to get right. You can't just decide to be optimally shallow and edit out a random half of your own knowledge and have a believable teenage narrator. Doesn't work that way. Go back and try again.
GRRRRR.
I am also probably being cranky to feel that there are far fewer "thick-headed shallow male teenager" stereotype POVs, and that people who write dizzy, shallow teenage girl narrators are likely to overlap significantly with the people who assumed I was dizzy and shallow for seven years just because I was a teenage girl. That is probably not fair of me.
GRRRRRRR.
Take Mike Resnick's story in Janis Ian's Stars anthology. (Do I have to say "please" here, or will you take the pleading for granted?) It starts out, "He's GORGEOUS! I mean, it's as if Morvich and Casabella and that old guy, Michael something, you know, the one who painted some big ceiling, as if they all got together and said, what's the most beautiful thing we can paint, the most beautiful thing in all the galaxy?"
If you read that and thought, "I hate the narrator and find her unbelievable and could not possibly care about anything she does ever," you are not alone. Later, the reader who is unwary enough to continue is treated to the gem, "He wasn't there today. I came home and cried and counted 51 ways to kill myself, but then I cracked a nail and had to go to the beautician to get the acrylic fixed." Oh, HA! Ha HA! Mike Resnick, you are so much with the funny!
Teenage dialect is hard to get right. You can't just decide to be optimally shallow and edit out a random half of your own knowledge and have a believable teenage narrator. Doesn't work that way. Go back and try again.
GRRRRR.
I am also probably being cranky to feel that there are far fewer "thick-headed shallow male teenager" stereotype POVs, and that people who write dizzy, shallow teenage girl narrators are likely to overlap significantly with the people who assumed I was dizzy and shallow for seven years just because I was a teenage girl. That is probably not fair of me.
GRRRRRRR.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 03:49 pm (UTC)At the very least, I think that anyone who wasn't a teenage girl (ditzy or not) at some point in their life should probably think very very carefully about why they think this voice is necessary, particularly those people seperated by more than a couple of decade from the teenage girls they're trying to write about. At the most, I'd like a taser for reprogramming purposes. (I'm a strong believer in aversion therapy through shock treatments. :)
It's that whole 'write what you know' bit--I don't object to people trying to write things they don't know on the level that others do(such as about being a teenage girl), but I do require that they actually seem to have tried to learn about it, in this case by doing more than watching Clueless a couple of times. Mike Resnick can never be a cutesy teenage girl, but he could actually pay attention to real life, and not just stereotypes, and I bet he could find ways to write teenage girls that let him get the same idea across with making us want to get our football player boyfriends to beat him up. ;)
At least this is the same Antho with "Come Dance With me" by Bisson isn't it? I liked that story, as I remember (he read it at Clarion) and that was a teenage girl written by a middle aged man who apparently paid attention to details in his life and noticed that even when teenagers are acting cutesy and ditzy and shallow, they're not automatically idiots.
And I think I lost track of my point in there, which was to say that even if you accept that he was writing an intentionally cutesy teenage girl, there are still good and bad ways to do it, and it sure sounds like there's nothing good about that way. :) Did you ever happen to read "Why I'm not Gorilla Girl," which was up on SH about a year ago? Given this post, I'd be interested to know if you'd recommend forcible deprogramming for that author as well, or if he suceeded at what he was trying to do.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 04:25 pm (UTC)Also since "that author" is Daniel, I "heard" it in my head as Daniel telling me the story, so I can't really be unbiased on how it worked. But it didn't annoy me as much as similar voices of that type have. (Still, if Daniel decides not to write novels in that voice, I think I'll be fine.)
And yes, I thought the Bisson narrator was much, much better. But I didn't think that character was aiming at cutesy, at the very least, nor did Bisson seem to find her so.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 04:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 04:19 pm (UTC)When I was 5, my godfather taught me how to speak valleygirl. Then, miraculously, he also taught me to stop.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 04:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 04:40 pm (UTC)I had The OC on the other day, which I've seen just enough to know how old people are supposed to be, without actually remembering what anyone looks like, and I thought the 'high school girls' were in their early thirties.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 04:13 pm (UTC)I'm not the biggest reader ever, but I don't think I've ever come across a story written from that POV. I'm wracking my brain trying to think what that would be like, and I keep coming up with Flowers for Algernon-type things, which would be so completely different. I think it wouldn't give authors a chance to think themselves clever with the verbiage, since if there is one thing "thick-headed shallow male teenager" stereotypes are *not*, it's noticeably verbal.
thick-headed shallow male teenagers
Date: 2005-01-10 04:52 pm (UTC)Re: thick-headed shallow male teenagers
Date: 2005-01-10 05:40 pm (UTC)Re: thick-headed shallow male teenagers
Date: 2005-01-10 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 05:19 pm (UTC)Though the examples in my head are mostly high fantasy, and ones where the author doesn't even try to come up with a teenage culture or slang. If you mean more sf or modern sorts of teenagers, I'm also drawing a blank.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 06:57 pm (UTC)(Not that I don't enjoy high fantasy; just usually not for its keen insights into the human condition.)
no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-11 12:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-11 03:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-11 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 11:31 pm (UTC)Maybe some of the characters in Louis Sachar's Holes, as well, and those do have more hidden depths.
Or would Zane Gray's laconic cowboys, all 6 feet tall, broad-shouldered, slim-hipped, and not terribly articulate, qualify?
no subject
Date: 2005-01-11 03:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 05:39 pm (UTC)Dizzy and ditzy girls
Date: 2005-01-10 07:42 pm (UTC)By the way, I love the following sentence. I thought it should be commemorated: "You can't just decide to be optimally shallow and edit out a random half of your own knowledge and have a believable teenage narrator."
That's just great!
Mack
Re: Dizzy and ditzy girls
Date: 2005-01-10 08:19 pm (UTC)Also, nicknaming your character anything that sounds like baby-talk for any excretory function at all is a bad thing. Mrissa's 47th Rule of Character Names.
Re: Dizzy and ditzy girls
Date: 2005-01-11 12:26 am (UTC)Re: Dizzy and ditzy girls (Podkayne of Mars)
Date: 2005-01-12 06:43 am (UTC)Heinlein did say with a number of characters, now that you remind me, that having kids was the most important part of being female. Not being female, I don't have much of an opinion on the matter. I'd hate to think that was the primary purpose, but evolutionarily speaking, it's probably a big part of many people's inner drives. I think winding up with two poodles when you realize later you wanted kids is probably a mistake (some of my relatives), but I think people should be able to be happy not having kids and society shouldn't force expectations on them.
I liked the genius, oddly-socialized and possibly dangerous brother in the book, instead. Clarke? I thought he was a lot more interesting than Poddy.
Mack
Re: Dizzy and ditzy girls (Podkayne of Mars)
Date: 2005-01-12 02:09 pm (UTC)And I think "even when I try my very hardest to write a book for girls, I can't help but make the bratty little brother brighter and more interesting" is not a good thing.
Re: Dizzy and ditzy girls
Date: 2005-01-10 09:00 pm (UTC)For that matter, I dislike his characterizations of women in general. But that's another story.
Re: Dizzy and ditzy girls
Date: 2005-01-12 06:36 am (UTC)I read almost all of Heinlein, back in high school and elementary. Some of his ideas were eye-opening and I'm not yet convinced they were all wrong. I remember being especially impressed at how he tied all his universes and characters together at the end of his life. I liked most of his women, but I have to confess, the sexual libertinism does read like wish fulfillment.
Mack
no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 08:50 pm (UTC)I realize that this is a minority opinion. But Eco is so on my Don't Fly list.
P.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 09:13 pm (UTC)K.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 11:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-11 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-11 02:52 pm (UTC)"The language, dress, hair styles change rapidly but the attitude of teens I find amazingly constant. If you don't have regular contact with many groups of teens on a daily basis I think it would be hard to see how much things change and how much some things stay the same. I want to write about the things that stay the same."
And no, I was *not* doing research yesterday looking for thick-headed shallow POV male characters. And if I was, that wouldn't be how I found this. Nope. Nuh-uh.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-11 10:01 pm (UTC)(1) Cutesy speech is implied rather than poured on like molasses. I remember in one of my very first writing workshops, I was told that if I wanted to write, say, a Scottish accent, I didn't need to go all Burnsian and say "Aye lassie, Ae'll be gooin' doon tae the river an' sure enow woold yae laik tae be a-goin' wit' me?" Because you'd read one page of that before your brain was in blathers.
Instead, just a touch here and there would be enough to get the accent go through the reader's mind: "Aye lass, I'm going down to the river. Would you"--or perhaps "ya" if you're feling ambitious--"like to come with me?"
Likewise, if you feel the need to write in Teenspeak, then it should be more than sufficient to say, "So he didn't want to go to the River Mall with me, you know? Whatever."
(2) The best teen characters I've read felt real because of the emotions they were going through, not cutesy dialogue. While these are examples I know a lot of people will disagree with, this was something I thought was authentic about the character of Garion in the Belgariad. Or the somewhat older Harry Potter in Order of the Phoenix. And since those are both boys, I'll also throw in the heroines of Tamora Pierce's YA fantasy, none of whom speak in Cutesy Teengirl Talk.
P.S.
Date: 2005-01-11 10:03 pm (UTC)