Nicer to me.
Oct. 12th, 2006 06:04 pmI swear people are nicer to me than they are to other people.
I just got a gift certificate in the mail from Rice Paper, thanking me for my warmth, support, and presence, which -- I am told -- enliven Rice Paper's spirit.
Golly.
It's one of my favorite restaurants, but I don't think I've done anything noteworthy there. I just, y'know, show up sometimes.
I am just knocked over by this. (And anyone suggesting it's the Vicodin can hush.)
This is the kind of thing that makes me think that people are nicer to me than they are to other people, and I can't really say why they would be, but it's extremely pleasant when it happens.
Wow.
I just got a gift certificate in the mail from Rice Paper, thanking me for my warmth, support, and presence, which -- I am told -- enliven Rice Paper's spirit.
Golly.
It's one of my favorite restaurants, but I don't think I've done anything noteworthy there. I just, y'know, show up sometimes.
I am just knocked over by this. (And anyone suggesting it's the Vicodin can hush.)
This is the kind of thing that makes me think that people are nicer to me than they are to other people, and I can't really say why they would be, but it's extremely pleasant when it happens.
Wow.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 01:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 12:27 am (UTC)I swear people are nicer to me than they are to other people. … I can't really say why they would be ….
Since I hardly know you yet I can only speculate, but is it possible that this phenomenon is proof of the famous postulate: "What goes around, comes around"?
no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 01:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 01:22 am (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 04:19 am (UTC)Yes, well, this comes of having good taste in lunch companions.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 10:42 am (UTC)Rice Paper
Date: 2006-10-13 04:21 am (UTC)B
Re: Rice Paper
Date: 2006-10-13 10:41 am (UTC)Re: Rice Paper
Date: 2006-10-13 01:51 pm (UTC)B
Re: Rice Paper
Date: 2006-10-13 01:56 pm (UTC)Re: Rice Paper
Date: 2006-10-13 01:58 pm (UTC)Last night we had medeocre Mexican food, so you don't have to.
B
Re: Rice Paper
Date: 2006-10-13 02:00 pm (UTC)Re: Rice Paper
Date: 2006-10-13 02:03 pm (UTC)B
Re: Rice Paper
Date: 2006-10-13 02:04 pm (UTC)Re: Rice Paper
Date: 2006-10-13 01:58 pm (UTC)(Sorry; it's early.)
B
no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 04:56 am (UTC)For example, sometimes I do wonder, when feeling lonely and lost, why while I send out books and chocolate and postcards myself, I rarely get any back.
I guess it is that I love sharing information, but the people who get my gifts work on different measuring system - they WOULD respond to emotional care, but they do not consider me smart enough to be worthy of gifts of books from them.
Or, may-be, they just think that I am competent and energetic enough to get all the books I need thorough the inter-library exchange (it IS expensive, as I would have to do the international exchange, but cheaper than buying online)and to get all the treats I need shopping online, so there is never any need to send me anything.
Or may-be I overthink and people from USA (who are the majority of my chocolate, postcard and book correspondents) just feel less confident with in international postal service? Or, may-be, unlike me, they enjoy buying gifts for themselves and so have no need to send packages?
Can you tell me why you have never felt any need to send me a book, yourself, even if I have felt the urge to send you books more than once? Knowing the reason would probably help me to understand what I should be doing differently, if anything.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 10:45 am (UTC)I don't think anybody thinks you're not smart enough to be worthy of book gifts, but the fact that you approach so many things as ways to demonstrate that you are unworthy induces a sort of paralysis.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 11:27 am (UTC)I HAVE been more show not tell lately, using too many images, but I try to make up for it by keeping entries up only temporarily, taking the old ones off after couple of days.
It is better that way - did you not feel that the mushroom entry was suitable only for the September, the prison guard entry would have been threat to someones privacy if left up and the chocolate covered curds would have just made people with no access to them salivating needlessly if staying up permanently? And entries about car accidents and hospitals just need to be temporary anyway.
When I believe something should stay public I just put it on Flickr (did you not love the Coca-cola comment in bog?)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 03:07 pm (UTC)It is nothing big that you did not read when I asked for help - may-be those were bits of information or stuff you could not or would not have helped me out with anyway.
It is just sad that nobody gave me gifts of books when I asked for them - but now that you have explained me possible reasons I know it was only my own fault anyway. That I asked in wrong way - that is why I failed to get what I asked for.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 03:46 pm (UTC)I don't know you at all, but my question reading this thread is...
Did you ask?
no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 04:25 pm (UTC)I am quite sure as one of the answers was: "How can I be sure your English is good enough to enjoy reading in English?"
Was I really asking for pearls for the proverbial pigs?
Even if such a respect towards books in general is wonderful, it is much less wonderful when accompanied with hint of: "You do think too much about your English skills!"
no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 11:56 am (UTC)Because you're nicer to other people than the average (way nicer, she said, with her husband firmly seconding that), people tend to be nicer to you.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 12:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 10:49 pm (UTC)